Bare-Knuckle Couture: “A Thousand Blows” Costume Designer Maja Meschede’s Knockout Designs

Editor’s note: Spoiler alert! This story discusses plot lines of A Thousand Blows Season 1.

The subtle storytelling of Maja Meschede’s costume designs is hiding in plain sight if you’re able to look away from the simmering drama of A Thousand Blows, a six-part series from Peaky Blinders scribe Steven Knight that follows Hezekiah Moscow (Malachi Kirby) and his brother Alec (Francis Lovehall), two Jamaicans immigrating to London during the late 1800s. Hezekiah has dreams of being a lion tamer but is hoodwinked by a circus conman, and with only a few pence in their pockets, the brothers resort to bare-knuckle boxing to scrape by. A chance encounter with the Forty Elephants, a gang of thieving women corralled by the droll wit of Mary Carr (Erin Doherty), further spirals uncertainty in their lives.

Knight gives viewers plenty to sink their teeth into (sorry, Mike Tyson), pairing a pulsing narrative that weaves the social class of London with complex characters whose names are torn from history books – Hezekiah, Alec, and the Forty Elephants among them, along with bare-knuckle boxer Sugar Goodson, brilliantly portrayed by Stephen Graham (who also serves as executive producer). Immersing the magnetic performances are moody textures, period wardrobe, and stylized regencycore hair and makeup. Meschede tells The Credits she had plenty of “design freedom” to express each character through costume.

 

When Hezekiah and Alec arrive in London, the customers dress them in outfits inspired by their native country. “When we first see them in the Victorian East End crowd I wanted them to really stick out. And as the color choice of Hezekiah’s first costume, I wanted it to subconsciously remind us of being in Jamaica, looking at the sea, the sand, and the light,” she notes. A straw hat added to the fish out of water feeling. “Nobody would wear such a straw hat in London because you don’t need that shelter from the sun,” she says. “I wanted Hezekiah’s costume to have this lightness. To feel like he just landed there and he has these hopes and dreams and no one will stop him.”

 

As Hezekiah becomes successful at boxing, his wardrobe evolves with him. “When he first arrives, he’s wearing linen and cotton. And then he manages to dress himself with his first winnings in a nice suit,” says Meschede. “I wanted him to conform at first because I think there’s an insecurity when you’re a stranger, a foreigner. But then later on, he expresses himself with more confidence.”

Malachi Kirby in “A Thousand Blows.” Courtesy Disney/Robert Vigalsky.

The costume designer admits there was plenty of work and research that went into the boxing matches featured in later episodes where the competitors fought with gloves. “I spoke to historians who specialize in Victorian boxing, and it’s hard to find anything original. We had so many fittings and had a special leather maker who made so many gloves for us. They had to look right; the weight, the thickness of the leather, the breakdown. The proportion of the gloves to make them work on a TV screen. They’re filled with horse hair, so we did quite a lot of tests,” Meschede explains. “And it’s really hard to make these gloves comfortable because of the way the thumb is cut, but the cast was totally on board supporting the costume and wearing them.”

Further thought went into detailing the four women of the Forty Elephants gang, played by Doherty, Hannah Walters, Darci Shaw, and Morgan Hilaire. “The characters are based on real women, and they’ve gone through a lot in their childhood and as teenagers. I’m sure life was extremely tough, but nevertheless, they found a way to survive. They found this group of women who became amazing thieves and very skilled. I wanted them to stand out,” Meschede notes. Period fashion provided the influence. “I looked at Victorian silhouettes, which I think are very powerful for recognition value and feeling like you’re in that time. Then, to express the rebelliousness of the characters, I used strong silhouettes and worked with brightly colored fabrics and patterns. I wanted them sometimes to really clash, to express this vibrancy, their power, and how they’re being really bold and confident.”

L-r: Morgan Hilaire, Hannah Walters, Erin Doherty, Nadia Albina, Caoilfhionn Dunne, Jemma Carlton. Courtesy Disney/Robert Vigalsky
Darci Shaw. Courtesy Disney/Robert Vigalsky.

Another consideration for the Forty Elephants was the class divide between the East End and uppity West End.  “Women of the East End at that time could have never afforded any silk, any lace, or anything handmade or custom made. So they really look almost out of place marching through the streets of the East End. I made sure the clothes looked used. They’re not perfect or brand new from a tailor, so they can melt into the background.” Garments were sourced from local UK vendors, handmade, or by altering existing period attire.

Erin Doherty. Courtesy Disney/Robert Vigalsky.

We’re introduced to the quartet early on in episode one in a scene where Mary screams in pain, clutching a baby bump among a crowd of concerned Londoners. However, it’s all a ruse, allowing the posse to pickpocket them – a scheme Hezekiah figures out from the jump. “When Mary pretends to give birth, they are kind of in cloaks and hiding away,” Meschede says. “I chose more subtle colors, but what we did was buy fabrics that were really bright, and then we dipped them. So you have vibrancy in the fabric, but it’s far more subtle. At the same time, we chose fabrics with really bold patterns that clash because I think that creates a wonderful energy that really stands out, but they can still blend into the rowd.”                                                                                                                                   

As the story reaches its climax in episode six, Hezekiah and Mary find themselves in a position to forever change their lives. Hezekiah is to fight boxing champion Buster Williams (Nathan Hubble), and the Forty Elephants use the crowded venue as their biggest score yet.

Malachi Kirby. (Disney/Robert Viglasky)

Meschede dressed the characters to reflect their character arc, with Mary wearing a show-stopping red gown. “There’s an evolution for each character. Some women become stronger and some women not,” she says. “And I don’t want to give too much away, but whoever didn’t feel like that, I faded the colors.” For Hezekiah, he reverts to his Jamaican roots, dressing in attire he wore when first arriving in London. The subtle touch brings the character full circle.

 

A Thousand Blows is streaming on Disney+ and Hulu, and Season 2 is already in the works.

 

 

Featured image: A THOUSAND BLOWS – “Episode 2” – After their brutal fight, Hezekiah finds himself firmly in Sugar’s sights. Mary steps up the plans for her heist and recruits the help of both Hezekiah and Lao. The Forty Elephants carry out a raid on Harrods, whilst Alec makes a new acquaintance. (Disney/Robert Viglasky)
STEPHEN GRAHAM, MALACHI KIRBY

Jon Bernthal Set to Return in a “Punisher” Standalone for Disney+

Jon Bernthal is ready to punish Disney+ (in a good way, folks) with more than just his upcoming role in Daredevil: Born Again

Bernthal’s inclusion in Marvel’s upcoming Daredevil series was manna from heaven for fans of his take on Frank Castle, the brutal antihero who exploded onto the scene in the second-season premiere of Netflix’s Daredevil, which starred Charlie Cox as Matt Murdock/Daredevil. Bernthal went on to lead his own stand-alone series on Netflix from 2017 to 2019.

The Hollywood Reporter confirms that Bernthal will now get his own standalone special as the Punisher on Disney+. He’ll co-write the series alongside Reinaldo Marcus Green, who will also direct. The special is slated to appear in 2026 alongside the second season of Daredevil: Born Again. 

Bernthal’s Frank Castle was more than an equal match for Cox’s sight-impaired but dauntless superhero back in the Netflix days. While Vincent D’Onofrio’s Kingpin was the Big Bad in the original series and returns again in Born Again as Dardevil’s chief antagonist (now having moved up in the world), when Frank Castle appeared on the scene in Hell’s Kitchen, he was a one-man army taking down gangs with his military knowledge and relentless tenacity. Bernthal’s stint as the Punisher was too short-lived for many fans, but Frank Castle rises again.

First up, however, is Daredevil: Born Again, which features a few familiar faces from the Netflix years. Joining Cox, D’Onofrio, and Bernthal are former Daredevil cast members Deborah Ann Woll as Karen Page, Wilson Bethel as Bullseye, and Elden Henson as Foggy Nelson. Another alumnus from the original Daredevil is fight and stunt coordinator Philip Silvera, who serves as both stunt coordinator and second unit director for the new series.

There’s another connection to Bernthal and The Punisher in Born Again. As the first Marvel series on Disney+ to feature a showrunner (previous series were led by head writers and directors), Born Again is led by Dario Scardapane, a writer on the original The Punisher

Daredevil: Born Again streams on Disney+ on March 4.

Featured image: LONDON, ENGLAND – NOVEMBER 17: Jon Bernthal attends the UK premiere of “King Richard” at Curzon Cinema Mayfair on November 17, 2021 in London, England. (Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images for Warner Bros.)

The Future of Batman at DC Studios Includes Giving a Surprising Villain His Own Film

When DC Studios co-chiefs Peter Safran and James Gunn delivered an update on their upcoming slate of films and TV shows at a screening room on the Warner Bros. studio lot in Burbank, they were revisiting the location of their first public reveal about their initial slate.

Two years ago, in January 2023, Gunn and Safran sat in the very same spot and updated the press on specifics for their new-look DC Studios. Yesterday, they came with a string of releases already under their belt, with the studio’s big kickoff movie, Gunn’s Superman, deep in the post-production process as it nears its July 11, 2025 release date.

With the David Corenswet-led Superman set to fly in a few months, production for director Craig Gillespie’s Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, starring Milly Alcock, at the halfway point, and the upcoming series Green Lanterns, led by stars Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre, entering production as well, there was plenty of action underway.

DC’s animated series Creature Commandos premiered on Max on December 5, 2024, while the live-action Peacemaker will debut its second season in August 2025.

But what about that other iconic DC Superhero, the one whose cape is black and who plies his trade in Gotham? Batman has been the most reliable and arguably beloved DC Studios superhero on the big screen for decades, beginning with Tim Burton’s 1989 classic Batman and through Christopher Nolan’s game-changing Dark Knight trilogy. The last time we saw Batman on the big screen, Robert Pattinson had taken up the cape and cowl in Matt Reeves’s critically acclaimed 2022 film The Batman. Gunn and Safran had answers about the future of the hero Gotham needs.

The official rollout of the new Batman will happen in Batman: The Brave and the Bold, which will be directed by The Flash helmer Andy Muschietti. Casting hasn’t begun on that film, so we’ll need to wait to see who becomes the official Bruce Wayne in Gunn and Safran’s unified DC Universe. With the success and acclaim of Reeves’ The Batman and the spinoff Max series The Penguin, which starred Colin Farrell’s scheming crime boss, this version of Gotham will exist independent of the unified DC Studios banner and exist, instead, under their Elseworlds banner. But The Batman Part II and a second season of The Penguin aren’t up first.

The first film Gunn and Safran confirmed was Clayface, with British director James Watkins (Speak No Evil) in talks to direct a film that is being billed as a “body horror” and would work as a pure horror movie for someone uninterested in DC’s canon of characters. The villain Clayface first appeared in Detective Comics in 1940 as a shape-shifting, clay-like villain who had once been an actor. After being exposed to radioactive protoplasm during the 1950s comics, he gained his shapeshifting powers.

The plan is to start shooting Clayface this summer. Who will play Clayface is another matter—he’s voiced by Alan Tudyk twice over in two animated series: Harley Quinn and Gunn’s Creature Commandos. But Gunn said Tudyk wouldn’t be playing the character in the live film.

As for The Batman Part II, Safran confirmed that Reeves hasn’t yet turned in a full script, but what they’ve read thus far is “incredibly encouraging.” The movie is slated for a 2027 release (initially, it was set to premiere in 2026). And will we see Colin Farrell reprise Oz Cobb in a second season of The Penguin? “We don’t know,” Safran said. “There are a lot of moving pieces — probably most important Colin himself.” It’s well-known just how grueling it is to become The Penguin, but perhaps the accolades and acclaim the series and Farrell’s performance have earned will get all the players back on the board.

Batman: The Brave and the Bold has a story “that is coming together nicely,” Safran said, and Gunn expressed his own increased focus on the film given how important Batman is to the DC universe. While Gunn confirmed that it was “very unlikely” that Pattinson would star as Batman in The Brave and the Bold, he left open the possibility that he might appear in a different film altogether.

“I wouldn’t rule anything out,” Gunn said. “He could show up in something else.”

Caption: ROBERT PATTINSON as Batman with the Batmobile in a scene in Warner Bros. Pictures’ action adventure “THE BATMAN,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures/ ™ & © DC Comics
Caption: ROBERT PATTINSON as Batman with the Batmobile in a scene in Warner Bros. Pictures’ action adventure “THE BATMAN,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures/ ™ & © DC Comics

Featured image: Caption: ROBERT PATTINSON as Batman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ action adventure “THE BATMAN,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Jonathan Olley/™ & © DC Comics

The Heart of Hell’s Kitchen: New “Daredevil: Born Again” Video Celebrates NYC Setting

“Daredevil is a New York superhero” are the first words we hear at the top of a new look at Daredevil: Born Again, which proudly (as any good New Yorker would) boasts about its Big Apple bonafides.

“You have this picaturesque view of the city; the backgrounds are the backgrounds…there are no green screens,” says executive producer Sana Amanat. “We made New York City a character.”

Another key collaborator in agreement that filming in New York City pays off in ways big and small is Matt Murdock himself, Charlie Cox, who says the city’s well-known energy adds to every shot. “The cars, the noise, the visuals, the people. It would be impossible to recreate,” Cox said. “It’s in the fabric of both of these men.”

The men Cox is referring to are his sight-impaired superhero and Vincent D’Onofrio’s brutal criminal super-boss Kingpin. The two are facing off for the first time since they clashed back when Daredevil was a Netflix series from 2015 to 2018. Since then, Matt Murdock had a brief, quite funny cameo in Spider-Man: No Way Home and a meatier role in She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, while D’Onofrio’s Kingpin has appeared in both Hawkeye and the spinoff series Echo. 

“The best thing about New Yorkers is they say whatever they want,” D’Onofrio says in the behind-the-scenes look. That includes, Cox reveals, regular New Yorkers addressing him as “DD” in the middle of a scene. 

Daredevil: Born Again will follow the grittier tone established in Echo, which was led by Alaqua Cox’s Maya Lopez and centered on her tortured past and her relationship with Kingpin. Born Again also includes one of Marvel’s most beloved antiheroes, Jon Bernthal’s The Punisher, as well as former Daredevil cast members Deborah Ann Woll as Karen Page, Wilson Bethel as Bullseye, and Elden Henson as Foggy Nelson. Another alumnus from the original Daredevil is fight and stunt coordinator Philip Silvera, who serves as both stunt coordinator and second unit director for the new series.

Check out the trailer below. Daredevil: Born Again streams on Disney+ on March 4.

 

Featured image: (L-R) Daredevil/Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox) and Wilson Fisk / Kingpin (Vincent D’Onofrio) in Marvel Television’s DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN exclusively on Disney+. Photo courtesy of Marvel Television. © 2025 MARVEL. All Rights Reserved.

From Acclaimed Ads to the Andes: Director Dougal Wilson’s Charming Feature Film Debut “Paddington in Peru”

Arguably the world’s most beloved (fictional) British immigrant, Paddington the Talking Bear arrived in London from South America in 2014 by way of the eponymous animated hit movie. Three years later, he returned for a sequel opposite Hugh Grant. This month, PG-rated Paddington in Peru (in theaters) continues the adventure as the marmalade-loving creature, based on Michael Bond’s children’s books and voiced by Ben Whishaw, returns to his native land in search of his beloved Aunt Lucy.

Trekking through the Amazonian rainforest, Paddington and his adoptive family (headed by Hugh Bonneville and Emily Mortimer) get sidetracked by Olivia Colman and Antonio Banderas’ shifty characters searching for the lost city of El Dorado.

Key players in the Paddington franchise braintrust, including animation director Pablo Grillo and VFX head Alexis Wajsbrot remained on board for this installment, but British director Dougal Wilson makes his feature film debut here on the strength of his quirky music videos and TV commercials. Wilson says, “I was flattered but very apprehensive — in fact I was terrified — because those first two films are held in such high regard.”

Speaking from Sydney, Australia, the site of his next project, Wilson explains how he and his team situated an animated bear within the mountains, rivers, and jungles of Peru.

 

The Paddington franchise had grossed nearly half a billion dollars worldwide when you were hired for Peru, yet you’d never directed a movie before. How did you get the gig?

Good question. I’d been quietly doing my day job—commercials and music videos—when the Paddington people approached me about doing the movie.

What was it about your shorts that convinced the producers you were their guy?

My stuff tends to be quite quirky, for want of a better word. In the UK, I directed commercials for a shop called John Lewis, which sometimes involved a CG character.  People tell me they have a deadpan charm to them, and maybe it’s too much to claim for a TV commercial, but they also had a bit of pathos. I did a commercial for Channel 4 about the Paralympics that had a lot of energy, so that maybe showed the producers that I could do chases and action scenes. I’ve also directed music videos, like the [puppet-action] one for Coldplay [Life in Technicolor]. With all those things combined, I guess the producers thought I could go from two minutes to 90 minutes. It was a bit of a leap of faith, and maybe they’d exhausted all their other options [laughing].

Director Dougal Wilson on set of “Paddington in Peru.” Courtesy Sony Pictures.

Unlike the first two pictures, Paddington is seen here mainly in South America rather than merry old England. How did you pull that off?

With great difficulty. I was very nervous about the story not being set in London because the first two movies provided a built environment where Paddington could be a fish out of water. Many of the set pieces and goofs are produced by that mismatch. We were now going to take that same character and put him inside a natural environment. To use a slightly tortured analogy, he’s a fish out of water who returns to the water but has forgotten how to swim. Somehow, that threw us into the idea that this could work.

Paddington in PADDINGTON IN PERU. Courtesy Sony Pictures.

What was involved in preparing for the shoot?

I traveled to Peru and Colombia with our location manager, Eddy Pearce, production designer Andy Kelly, and our DP, Erik Wilson. We looked at rivers and mountains and bits of forest. Then the film got delayed, and I stayed in Peru because I hadn’t spent any time in South America before. I went to Machu Picchu and Lima and traveled right into the rainforest, got a little motorized canoe, and went up an Amazon tributary to spend time in this reserve. It was fantastic. So, I got the country under my skin a little bit. The next year, we went back and did the film.

 

How did you place this animated character in the thick of what looks like an Amazonian rainforest?

The cost would have been prohibitive to have the full main unit and main actors in Peru, but we had the whole story very tightly storyboarded and pre-visualized, so we sent out the second unit. They filmed mountain backgrounds, shot the river with 360 cameras, went up into the Andes, had their Steadicams running down corridors [of Incan ruins] in Machu Picchu, and got all this information about the lighting. Then, they brought all these environments and backgrounds back to London. We prepared the foregrounds for our actors. With the help of our incredible VFX supervisor, Alexis Wajsbrot, we blended all this stuff together.

 

Paddington and the Brown family get tossed around on a riverboat trying to navigate ferocious rapids. The sequence looks very exciting, but it must have been complicated to create.

The riverboat sequence was one of the biggest challenges because filming our actors in a boat in the Amazon would have been nigh on impossible. So we constructed a boat on a big hydronic gimble in the middle of a backlot at Sky Studios Elstree in London.

No kidding!

We surrounded [the rig] with Chroma key [green] screens and added wind, water, and movement. The actors had to be strapped in harnesses, which were painted out later, because it was wobbly and windy. Since we weren’t really on a river, we were able to play with the performances, do multiple takes, and tweak the camera movements.

Paddington in PADDINGTON IN PERU. Courtesy Sony Pictures.

The action comes through strong.

It helps that this film has a slightly heightened storybook style. For Werner Herzog’s Aguirre Wrath of God, one of our references, they literally went to the river and put people on a raft! We weren’t quite as rock and roll as they were. Fitzcarraldo was also a big reference for us. But we were more in the storybook style of Indiana Jones and Hergé’s “Tin Tin” books, so we did have a license for our film to be a little heightened.

Who is Lauren?

Lauren Barrand is a smaller person, a fantastic actress in her own right, who dresses as Paddington and wears the hat and the coat when we’re blocking scenes. Off-screen, someone who sounds a bit like Ben Whishaw reads Paddington’s lines, and Lauren mimes to those lines. We shoot a few takes with Lauren, and then she steps out. By that point, we’ve established eyelines, and all the actors know what they’re doing. But I hope that’s not ruining the magic for anyone. That’s when Paddington himself comes out of the trailer, and we only have one take. He’s a very busy bear!

Paddington in PADDINGTON IN PERU. Courtesy Sony Pictures.

Which comes first with Paddington: the animation or Ben Whishaw’s recordings of the dialogue?

Ben actually comes afterward. Once we’ve shot and edited this [live-action] stuff, we take it to a sound studio in London, and Ben’s there. The animation is not fully done yet: Sometimes, it’s rudimentary or just a pose or, worse still, one of my drawings. Ben then has to imagine the wonderful animation that’s going to come. We film Ben’s face to inform the animation, but it’s not motion capture; I want to emphasize that. There are no green dots. We edit the bit of dialogue we want for that shot, which goes to Pablo and his team. They construct the animation around Ben’s performance, which is then swapped in with the live actors.

 

Ben Whishaw has this beguiling quality even when playing a hitman in the new Keira Knightley thriller Black Doves. What’s he like to direct?

I was blessed to have Ben do Paddington because he understands that we’ve shot the scene before he gets involved. He’s not precious whatsoever about doing a line slower or faster, putting a pause here, or emphasizing that word. Ben’s a great actor, and he has infinite patience.

You spent nearly three years helping to create this new Paddington story, which has already grosse $129 million overseas. Why do you think people respond so well to this character?

Paddington always assumes the best in everybody, which is, I think, a very endearing quality. He has a slightly childish innocence, especially in the way that Ben performs him and the way he’s been animated by the very clever Pablo Grillo and his team at Framestore. The design, the animation, the voice, the script, and the outlook all combine to present this lovely character who’s almost wise but, at the same time, very innocent. To me, that makes Paddington very watchable.

Paddington in Peru is in theaters now.

For more upcoming films from Sony Pictures, check out these stories:

Oscar-Nominated Producer Maria Carlota Bruno on Recreating a Transcendent Heroine in “I’m Still Here”

Issa Rae on the Importance of Filming “One Of Them Days” on the Streets of Los Angeles

“28 Years Later” Trailer Releases Hell in Director Danny Boyle’s Long-Awaited Zombie Thriller Sequel

Featured image: Paddington in PADDINGTON IN PERU. Courtesy Sony Pictures.

Red Alerts & Cherry Blossom Brawls With “Captain America: Brave New World” Production Designer Ramsey Avery

When Steve Rodgers (Chris Evans) passed the Captain America shield to Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie), the former Falcon sidekick had big boots to fill. The same could be said for production designer Ramsey Avery in developing director Julius Onah’s Captain America: Brave New World, which has earned over $200 million worldwide at the time of publishing.

Avery, who touts decades of credits, including being on the art department teams of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 and Spider-Man: Homecoming, is no stranger to designing superhero settings. But what makes Brave New World visually appealing is how the environments look and feel real. Not to say VFX supervisors Bill Westenhofer (Life of Pi) and Alessandro Ongaro (The Adam Project) didn’t have heavy lifting to do. They very much did. But Onah’s film delivers themes of self-identity and reflection on a visually photorealistic platter over a feast of blue screen magic.

“One of the directives in this movie was that it had to be grounded. That was a big word. Our discussion of it was getting to a grounded characteristic, a gritty characteristic, a visceral characteristic where the audience felt it was super real. And so we tried as much as we could to do everything in camera,” says Avery.

For the story that sees Sam on a chase all over the world, including Mexico, West Virginia, and a climactic clash with U.S. President Thaddeus Ross (Harrison Ford) in Washington D.C., production was based in Atlanta, Georgia, at Trilith Studios, with additional time at Tyler Perry Studios and on location in D.C. to film its iconic landmarks. Among the dozens of sets Avery designed, he was tasked with replicating the White House, its Rose Garden, and D.C.’s Hains Point.

Below, he discusses those challenges, how color influenced design choice, and the best way to destroy a city.

Iconography

With Sam Wilson as the new Captain America, it was important to keep the iconic images of the character in familiar territory.

Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson/Captain America in Marvel Studios’ CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD. Photo by Eli Adé. © 2024 MARVEL.

Avery:  In terms of the iconography specific to Captain America, all of that comes from Ryan Meinerding [head of visual development at Marvel Studios]. He and his department are responsible for developing that specific superhero imagery in interaction with the Marvel executives and the director. Then, in many cases, that has to go down to the costume designer to figure out how to make it real.  So, it’s hard for us in production design to take much specifically from that or the comic books because the MCU isn’t the comic books. There’s a different history going on and we’re not encouraged to dig too deep into all of that. What we were really interested in is what’s going on in Sam’s head, what’s his journey through this movie, and how do we show that in a visual narrative to the audience.

Self-Identity

The story’s emotional through-line has Sam finding his way as Cap, while President Ross is trying to escape a troubled past. Self-identity is a theme of the narrative, and the production designer infused visual motifs to support it. 

Avery: Both Sam and Ross are having a bit of an identity crisis and trying to figure out who they are, what they want to be, how they want to be perceived, and what they want to project. Talking with Julius and also the costume designer, cinematographer, and visual effects about how we’re going to convey all of that, we ended up in two general strokes. And one was to look at the volumes of the volumetric space of the storytelling.

At the beginning of the story, both characters are stuck in boxes of their own making. We looked for ways to craft environments that start off keeping them enclosed, such as smaller shapes or darker areas—things that make them feel more isolated in their worlds.

(L-R): Harrison Ford as President Thaddeus Ross and Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson/Captain America in Marvel Studios’ CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD. Photo by Eli Adé. © 2024 MARVEL.

We see Ross at the very beginning of the movie making a big speech in New Hampshire in this huge space. But we find him first stuck backstage, back behind some glass, where we get that sense of that reflection playing towards him figuring out who he is and what he’s going to do. And even when he walks out on stage, he’s separated from the audience by those glass panels so that he’s still contained within his world. Similarly with Sam, in that fight sequence at the very beginning, one of the things that you can see is that it ends up getting enclosed in these darker, tighter spaces. So there’s a whole arc of that type of volume exploration where they detail their identities until the very end.


Story through Color

Production design shifted the color palette to inform emotion, with shades of blue hinting at control while warmer hues allude to disorder.

Avery: We did a whole color script for the movie and discussed the color, lighting, and composition of the scenes. We know that the Hulk is red, and the journey for Ross is from control to chaos, so we wanted to explore this idea of control to lack of control. We developed a color palette for the movie where blue represents things mostly in control or where people think they’re in control. Then we go through green to yellow to orange to red, where you lose control as you get to red. You’ll see in Sam’s office there’s more blue. There’s also blue in the room where Sam and Ross meet for the first time when they go into the East Room. That type of playing with color carried through the whole storyline.

A Rose Garden Showdown

During a speech in the White House Rose Garden, Ross loses his control over the Hulk, unleashing the red beast. Can Cap save the day?

Avery: We did a lot of research to figure out the Rose Garden. We looked historically at what different Rose Gardens were to say something about our Rose Garden and our Ross. We looked back to the Kennedy when there was this kind of aspirational sense of what the White House was trying to sell itself on. So we use some of that Rose Garden because that’s the same thing that Ross wanted – this idea about being aspirational and looking forward and keeping some optimism.

Then, we decided to build the Rose Garden true to size. We also studied Julius’s movie references, which were these 1970s political thrillers, and how those movies framed their shots. We looked at how we would use those really strong lines in the Rose Garden to give us a sense of strong framing and a sense of control. Then, when all hell breaks loose, we break all of the clean lines and those strong geometries.

We wanted to do as much destruction as we could practically, too. So when Hulk pulls out that column, a lot of that is a practical effect. The lectern that gets tossed is real, and the stage collapsing. All of those things are practical elements that then get enhanced. It brings that reality and makes it more grounded.


A fight among the Cherry Blossoms

A climatic sequence had the production designer re-creating Hains Point, which required a towering three-sided blue screen and help from the greens department.

Avery: The wish was to shoot in D.C., but for all kinds of reasons, it didn’t make sense. So it fell on the art department and talking with the director, DP (Kramer Morgenthau), and visual effects to sort it out. We went to Hains Point in D.C. and researched it. But the actual fight happens within about a two-thirds size of a football field set we built in the same place as the Rose Garden. There was a whole process of figuring out how to use the same footprint to make it look bigger than it really was. So, we rearranged light poles, cars, fences, and trees to figure out things logistically.

We actually filmed the destroyed version of Hains Point first, then the clean version. We first built the clean version and then built the destroyed version on top of the clean version. Then over a couple days we removed all the destructive stuff out, exposing the clean stuff underneath and put in new cherry blossom trees.

Captain America/Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie) in Marvel Studios’ CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD, exclusively on Disney+. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2024 MARVEL.

 

Captain America: Brave New World is in theaters now. 

Featured image: Red Hulk/President Thaddeus Ross (Harrison Ford) in Marvel Studios’ CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2024 MARVEL. 

Producer Joseph Patel Explores Sly Stone’s Life & Legacy in “Sly Lives! (aka The Burden of Black Genius)”

Prodigiously gifted songwriter/singer/arranger/producer/bandleader/keyboardist/guitarist Sly Stone gets his well-deserved close-up in documentary makers Joseph Patel and Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson‘s SLY LIVES! (aka The Burden of Black Genius). After earning an Academy Award for Summer of Soul, producer Patel and director QuestLove decided to deep-dive into the life and music of the man whose multi-racial band once thrilled hippies and Black audiences alike with ingenious funk-pop anthems including “I Want to Take You Higher,” “Dance to the Music,” “Everyday People,” “Stand!” “Thank you (Falettinme Be Mice Elf),” “Hot Fun in the Summertime,” “Family Affair,” and “If You Want Me to Stay.”

Stone, now 82, followed the 1967-1975 hit parade with several decades of drug abuse. “There have been books and amateur docs that reveled in Sly Stone’s downfall,” says Patel. By contrast, he explains, “We wanted to tell his story with empathy. Can you imagine being 26 years old, a Black artist headlining Woodstock, being on the cover of Rolling Stone, Black audiences and white audiences are both looking to you like you’ve solved race relations with your music? What kind of pressure that must have been for him!”

Sly Lives!, now streaming on Hulu after its Sundance Film Festival debut last month, presents rare concert footage interwoven with interviews featuring bandmates, members of Stone’s family, and contemporary Black musicians who now encounter the same kinds of pressures that Sly Stone faced in his heyday.

Speaking from his home in Brooklyn, Patel, who spent two and a half years on Sly Lives!, talks about how Sly Stone grappled with the burden of Black genius.

 

Archival footage in this film documents peak Sly Stone and his great band in such an exhilarating way, but then…

The movie intentionally starts out exhilarating and then gets sad, but hopefully, it ends on an optimistic note—he’s still with us!

Sly Stone seemed to be supremely confident on stage, so it’s surprising to learn in the film that he suffered from intense stage fright.

We talked to Sly’s former assistant slash girlfriend, Stephani Owens, about that. She’d say to Sly, “How can you be anxious? You do this all the time?” But then you also have [ex-girlfriend/singer] Ruth Copeland’s story where Sly’s at a venue, and he’s in the bathroom for an hour and a half, probably quelling his nerves with drugs because it’s so hard for him to walk on stage.

AHMIR “QUESTLOVE” THOMPSON (DIRECTOR & EXECUTIVE PRODUCER), JOSEPH PATEL (PRODUCER) – SLY LIVES! (Disney/Kelsey McNeal)

Sly Stone himself was not interviewed for this movie. Why is that?

We couldn’t interview him because of health concerns. Instead, we talked to artists like D’Angelo. When Ahmir played drums in his band on the 2000 Voodoo tour [named after the platinum-selling album], he witnessed D’Angelo struggling to come out on stage every night and perform “How Does It Feel” with his shirt off and a perfect body. D’Angelo hadn’t done an interview in 10 years, so for him to admit that he’d gone through feelings of shame and guilt and anxiety—that was jaw-dropping. Q-Tip knows what it’s like to have people expect you to do a thing you don’t want to do anymore. Andre 2000—all his fans want him to rap, but he’s like, “No, I know how this can go if I rap and my heart’s not in it. So I’m going to go play the flute.” These artists all sort of serve as proxies for Sly and this idea of the burden of Black genius.

 

Before the drugs took over, Sly Stone crafted incredibly catchy songs with fantastic arrangements. For music nerds, it’s a treat to hear him working with the Family Stone to perfect these tracks in the studio. How did you get ahold of that material?

Sony was very gracious in letting us into their archives so we could listen to studio sessions. When we pulled reels of Sly and the Family Stone recording their debut in ’67, it was fascinating to hear his confidence in directing the engineer and the band members. “Everyday People” take one — you hear Rose Stone at the piano, you hear Sly telling Jerry Martini and Cynthia Robinson, “Your horns aren’t right.” You hear him saying, “Do it again,” over and over. You can tell he hears the music in his head and has a singular creative focus on getting it right.

 

The documentary also highlights Sly Stone’s impact on Black artists like Chic leader Niles Rodger and Janet Jackson producers Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, who talk about sampling a guitar riff from “Thank you (Falettinme Be Mice Elf)” and using it onRhythm Nation.”

Our intent was not just to tell you that Sly was a great musician but to show you how he did it. What better way to do that then to have Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis and Niles Rodger, musicians who are hitmakers themselves and were directly influenced by Sly, laying down the craft for you.

 

Ahmir interviewed many top Black artists for Sly Lives! Was it easy getting musicians to participate?

Yes and no. I can’t name names, but two artists canceled on us the day of or the day before their interviews. One of them called Ahmir at four o’clock in the morning and said, “I’m not coming.” I freaked out because we had the room, we had the crew, we’d spent this money, but Ahmir was like, “There’s a bigger idea here about people who self-sabotage because of their fear of success, and these artists are sort of living that in real-time.” One reason Ahmir wanted to make this film was to show his peers that Sly went through the same thing. Other artists go through the same thing. They don’t need to feel alone.

On the subject of self-sabotage, this film shows how drug use and isolation escalate when Sly moves from San Francisco to L.A. and holes up in the attic of this big BelAir mansion for hours at a time.

As Sly’s old manager Stephen Paley told us, he didn’t really need the band anymore, and you see it in the song titles. It’s not “We” and “Us” anymore; it’s “I” and “Me” song titles. What does that isolation do to people? [Writer/filmmaker] dream hampton says the biggest way people self-sabotage is by ruining relationships, and here we are seeing that play out on the screen.

You guys include Family Stone concert footage never seen before. Where did you find it?

We have two great archival producers, Matthew Van Deventer and Bianca Cervantes, who helped a lot. There’s also a pair of twins in the Netherlands who’ve been collecting Sly stuff for 35 years, a guy in Germany, a guy named Neal Austinson [Stone’s former road manager], who had stuff that hadn’t been touched in a decade. It was about ingratiating ourselves, talking shop, sort of proving our aim was true. Summer of Soul is a good calling card to have. Then we digitized all this and tracked down who owned the rights. The last thing got cleared only about two weeks before Sundance. This movie took two and a half years, and we used every ounce of that time frame

 

Black guitarist Vernon Reid, whose band Living Color, like Sly and the Family Stone, also appealed to white audiences, has the last word in this documentary. How did that come about?

I gave Vernon ten pages of homework, songs to listen to and videos to watch, so he really came prepared. We’d been circling around this idea of “Sly Lives!” as the title, partly because we weren’t sure he’d be alive by the time we finished. So after we’d interviewed Vernon, he said “I want to say one more thing.” We were like, “Cool.” And he goes into this monologue about how Sly Stone gave us so much, and then he ends by saying “Sly lives.” Ahmir and I looked at each other in the studio, and we were like, “Oh my god, Vernon just landed the plane for us on the title.

Sly Stone’s children add a personal dimension to the story. Did you enjoy listening to their insights?

One of my favorite lines in the movie is when Sly Stone’s daughter Novena said he likes pizzas with all the toppings and westerns and cars, “like a standard old Black man.” If you told 26-year-old Sly that he would be 82 and his daughter would describe him as a standard old Black man, he’d take that in a heartbeat.

You filmed in New York, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Minneapolis. Were you mindful of how this project economically contributed to the filmmaking community, including the below-the-line crew?

Of course. It’s a miracle anything gets made and released into the world. That doesn’t happen unless you have an incredible team of people, in roles big and small, working towards a common goal. Movies are magic, and all of us are deeply appreciative that we get to do this for a living. I think a lot of us would do this work for free but it’s nice to get paid and to pay other people to be a part of it. 

 

 

Featured image: SLY LIVES! (AKA THE BURDEN OF BLACK GENIUS – “SLY LIVES! (aka The Burden of Black Genius)” examines the life and legacy of Sly & The Family Stone, the groundbreaking band led by the charismatic and enigmatic Sly Stone. The film captures the band’s rise, reign and subsequent fadeout while shedding light on the unseen burden that comes with success for Black artists in America. (Courtesy of Disney)

Be Still My Bursting Chest: “Alien: Romulus’s” Oscar-Nominated VFX Team on Finding Fresh Horror for the Franchise

Alien: Romulus Visual Effects Supervisor Eric Barba and FX Designer Alec Gillis bring the past and future together. Set between the events of Ridley Scott’s ferocious opener Alien and James Cameron’s muscular sequel Aliens, Barba, Gillis, and their team fused the tangible, practical horror and decay of the original films with a more modern, rock-and-roll sensibility. The viscerally immersive results earned the film an Academy Award nomination for Best Visual Effects. It’s part of a slew of horror films that were nominated for Oscars this year, a welcome coup for lovers of the often-overlooked genre (at least when it comes to awards season).

Barba, along with Nelson Sepulveda-Fauser, Daniel Macarin, and Shane Mahan, is nominated for Alien: Romulus. Director Fede Álvarez’s lean and mean interquel follows Rain Carridine (Cailee Spaeny) and her synthetic brother, Andy (David Jonsson), searching for a better life off their doomed and dreary planet. Along with a young crew, the two journey out into space to scavenge a derelict space station that, at first blush, seems empty. They turn out to be horrifically wrong

The monstrous aliens in Romulus might be familiar to fans of the franchise, but in the hands of Barba and Gillis, the terrors are fresh and the sequences vividly bold. The pair speak with The Credits about crafting a new chestburster for the ages, dazzling models, and a thrilling zero-gravity sequence.

 

Eric, a part of the beauty of the Alien franchise is always the brutishness and flaws in its technology—what doesn’t work, what isn’t slick. Were you looking to create flaws in post-production? 

Eric Barba: Absolutely. One of the reasons I pushed to make the miniature of the Corbelan [the main ship in the film] and the probe was because when a CG artist gets an amazing model from concept art, the way that model ends up coming out and getting textured and finished is very different than when a miniature model maker makes it. When a crew makes it physically with their hands and paintbrushes, putting all the tiny details on it, it just has a different feel. Those first two films had that in spades. If we were going to sit in between, we needed to lean on it. I called it going back to the analog future, and Fede was constantly pushing us toward that. 

Isabela Merced as Kay in 20th Century Studios’ ALIEN: ROMULUS. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Alec, given the franchise’s history, how did you want to bridge Romulus between Ridley Scott’s Alien and James Cameron’s Aliens?

Alec Gillis: I worked on the second one when I was about 25, so this was a warm, fuzzy feeling for me. What we have to do, even though I’m in the practical world, is maintain the visceral feelings you got when you watched those two earlier films, but that we’ve upgraded the technology and the approach. We’re giving the audience something that doesn’t look like it was lifted out of one of those earlier movies. The work has advanced in all ways, in what I do and in what Eric does, so we want to make sure that while it has a callback to those movies, it is a contemporary film.

 

A very contemporary sequence is the zero-gravity set piece involving Rain shooting the Xenomorphs. Eric, how was that scene accomplished? 

Eric Barba: A lot of coffee, a lot of time, because each shot dictates a different technique. For example, for the elevator sequence, we built a two-story vertical set, and then we also built a five-story horizontal set. Imagine the whole elevator essentially on its side, with rigging and rails on the top to fly our actors. The actors would sit in the center of it, and then we’d bring in our cranes to shoot as much as we could. Then you have to add a Xenomorph, and in some cases, the Legacy team couldn’t get their animatronic in there. Depending on the set, we either had to add a CG Xeno or enhance practical elements. Certainly, we were always adding to what we shot – flying debris, making sure her hair was always floating around, whether practically or with CG. There are some CG bits in there where we have a full CG Rain and CG Andy, along with extensions for either side of the set. 

Cailee Spaeny as Rain Carradine in 20th Century Studios’ ALIEN: ROMULUS. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

The sets were constructed to make the viewer feel as claustrophobic as the characters. For the chestburster scene, it was such a tight space. How did that impact your work, Alec?

Alec Gillis: [Production designer] Naaman Marshall, what he came up with was claustrophobic. We walked in on the set, which they had already been shooting in, and  I looked around, going, “Are any of these walls wild?” It’s all steel. [A “wild” wall means that it can be moved easily.]

Eric Barba: It’s on a gimbal.

Alec Gillis: And it’s 20 feet in the air on a hydraulic gimbal. It’s going to feel claustrophobic. We spent a couple of days in advance of shooting that, clearing out some of the framework for [actor] Aileen Wu to sit down. She was below the steel deck with a fake body attached to her, and then we had to puppeteer the little guy. I had a bunch of puppeteers – people under the deck, moving controllers depending on the angle. It reminded me of the fun times I had on older movies. On Friday the 13th: Part IV, Jason gets the machete in his head and slides down it – it felt like we were in a cabin in Topanga with six of us all on top of each other. 

Aileen Wu as Navarro in 20th Century Studios’ ALIEN: ROMULUS. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Eric Barba: It was like a small car, when you guys would come out, it’d be like clowns. They’d just keep coming. 

Alec Gillis: You could easily say, “Well, it’s just a chestburster. We’ve seen a chestburster a lot.” But we tried to put things into it that would make it more organic, more special, and more performative. In addition to that, we had an oversized chestburster as well. It was essentially double scale, with a double-scale chest piece of Aileen. Shoutout to Aileen Wu, who was a trooper in that scene. 

Alec Gillis: She played it beautifully, as did Isabela Merced. For me, my creatures depend on the way the actors react to them. If they’re not reacting, my creatures are multitudes less effective.

 

When you say a “more organic chestburster,” what did that entail? 

Alec Gillis: Smoothness of the mechanisms. Listen, nothing will ever beat the first chestburster sequence. Absolute genius. But if you analyze it, turn the sound off, and just look at it, you see they were working with the technology of the time. Now, we can use 3D design programs to create our mechanisms and smooth-moving parts. They’re still cable puppets – like a bicycle brake, when you squeeze it, it pulls a cable. We have joysticks and so on. The movements were much smoother than ever before. We also had some servo-actuated aspects, too. In our double-scale chestburster we had little lip snarls, arm movement, and a sack that pulled off of it.

Eric Barba: It changed color. That part was amazing.

Alec Gillis: Yeah, that was a fun one. I noticed that [Concept Designer] Dane Hallett had done some beautiful artwork of the chestburster. I looked at Dane’s illustration and thought, It’s black this time. That’s interesting. And Fede goes, “Yeah, but I want it to change from fleshy yellow to black.” And I said, “That’s a perfect place for a digital color change.” And he said, “You’re a practical effects artist, so you should really do this practically.” I went, “You’re right. We should figure that one out.” 

How’d you figure that one out?

Alec Gillis: We came up with a multilayered dome—a clear, flexible silicone with a paper-thin space between it and the body. We injected dark fluid into a cavity, then suctioned out the clear. You can go back and forth to create a pulsing effect. 

For more on Alien: Romulus, check out these stories:

Designed to Shred: How “Alien: Romulus” Costume Designer Carlos Rosario Stylized Horror

“Alien: Romulus” Costume Designer Carlos Rosario’s Retro Vision & Vintage Style Blends – Part One

Featured image: Xenomorph in 20th Century Studios’ ALIEN: ROMULUS. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Electric Shock: How “A Complete Unknown’s” Oscar-Nominated Sound Team Re-Created Bob Dylan Going Electric

In the first part of our conversation with the Oscar-nominated sound team of James Mangold’s music biography A Complete Unknown, they talked about delivering an intensely music-centric film without using playback and differentiating between the soundscapes of 1961 New York, when Bob Dylan (an immaculate portrayal by Timothée Chalamet) first arrives in the city, and four years later towards the end of the film. Now, we continue the discussion with sound mixer Tod A. Maitland, supervising sound editor Donald Sylvester, supervising music editor Ted Caplan, and re-recording mixers Paul Massey and David Giammarco on how they recreated the famed 1965 Newport Folk Festival and kept the story feeling raw and real.

 

Let’s jump right into the 1965 Newport Film Festival, where Bob performed with electric instruments for the first time, and it was very controversial.

Caplan: They filmed that almost like a concert, which gives it so much life and authenticity. They did three 30-minute straight passes, starting with the Texas Work Song Group all the way until Timmy sings, ‘It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue.’ That’s all done live, filming with multiple cameras to pick up all the angles. It’s like capturing a real concert and cutting it together rather than doing a bunch of close-ups and catching everyone’s coverage separately. That gave it a real, authentic feel.

How did that raw feeling of being at a live show translate from the recordings to the screen?

Caplan: It’s such a tricky sequence because it has to have a build, but it also has to feel big and exciting right from the beginning. The real brilliance of what Paul [Massey] pulled off was to have it hit you hard from the beginning and still feel like it’s getting bigger, louder, and rowdier as it goes without hurting the audience. Using a mix of delays, EQs, and compression, he brought to life the space, intensity, and excitement of the music at Newport ‘65 in particular, but also throughout the movie. He does it seamlessly so it feels like they belong.

 

Massey: The first song, ‘Maggie’s Farm,’ needed to be the biggest and loudest performance in the film up to that point. But then he played two more electric songs that needed to be elevated and not flatlined. I didn’t want to do that simply with level, making them louder, so I increased the bass elements, emphasized the PA with reverbs and delays, and generally increased the intensity by changing the richness and colors of the instruments and vocals. This way, the mix didn’t need to get crazy loud, but the intensity of the performance was ramped up. Throughout this performance, the crowd and music had to play off each other, with most of the audience booing and shouting unfavorable comments to contrast Bob’s rebellion and desire not to be swayed from the music he wanted to play.

Timothée Chalamet and Monica Barbaro in A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. Photo Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2024 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

What was it like to cut multiple live-to-camera performances into that one sequence?

Caplan: We need to give a lot of credit to our picture editors [Andrew Buckland and Scott Morris], who had to cut picture and sound with this. I worked with them to make sure we could tell the story and keep the music in time, which is tricky when you’re not using a click track. Usually, you have something very tight to work with, but since there’s so much flexibility in those tracks, it took a lot of detailed work sitting with them. They put together an amazing performance that feels seamless, even though we had to cut out a few verses to trim it down. It was important to make sure that it felt like you were there watching a live show and it wasn’t just a needle drop. We also had the crowds reacting, which Don can talk about.

 

Sylvester: It was a team effort to create these crowds in different situations. The story about Bob includes how the crowds responded to him, and there were a lot of different reactions to him throughout his career. The film shows his introduction to the world and how quickly they embraced and idolized him. A lot of these crowds were not on the set, so they had to be recreated. Luckily, because Tod [Maitland] gave us so many tracks to choose from, we had a good basis of what the actual crowds were doing on the set, so we could embellish that. We did it in many layers. We started with the practical crowds, the 200 people in the first few rows who were really there. Then, I added another layer with the loop group with 15-20 people, and we did multiple passes of that. But it’s never going to sound like 15,000 people. So, I needed Dave to bring out the three-dimensional library sounds of crowds to make it sound like what we’re expecting at that moment, which is not easy to do because there are a lot of crowds out there in the world. Dave, you can tell us how you found those crowds.

 

Giammarco: Tod gave us great recordings of crowds; that was the base. I separated what he had between positive reaction, negative reaction, and close-up groups, all of which would be supported by other effects of crowds. Then, I used a lot of that to pepper bigger crowds throughout. We manipulated those sound libraries to do what we needed. Sometimes the audience had a negative reaction in a close-up or a wide shot, another audience might be more enthusiastic. So, it was manipulating the crowds with some plug-ins and things and building it so we had big crowds for the big concerts, negative big crowds, positive big crowds, and close-up crowd reactions that I could raise, lower, move, or shift in the final mix. I had crowds of different sizes on different faders to control how that crowd could ebb, flow, and react. Then, Don’s crowd and group would be the topping that punctuated and accentuated what we were seeing. We tried to have authentic reactions that matched what we’re seeing on the screen.

For younger audiences who may not be as familiar with Dylan’s music, this film immerses the viewer in that world.

Maitland: It was kind of the same way on set. What Jim [Mangold] really wanted was to create an environment that was as real as possible for the actors. So, we had everything going on at the same time. Normally, for post-production, I would try to get all the different sound pieces separate, but Jim wanted this movie to be done as if it were a live show. For example, on the streets, we had those musicians playing ‘Puff, the Magic Dragon,’ the opera singer, a car going by, and people yelling in the streets. We even added sirens to create more energy. We also did that with the Cuban Missile Crisis scene. Terence put together a soundtrack that we played on set to go along with Walter Cronkite and the TV news to give the actors more of a feeling of panic. I know that made it much more difficult for my friends in post, but it created a really great environment. Normally, we’re always trying to get everything as clean as possible, but on this one, it was just about servicing the actors, which was very interesting.

 

Sylvester: That was one of our goals in creating this world from 1961-1965. Many people watching this film haven’t lived in that part of the world at that time. What we like to do is create a world that you’ve never been in, but you feel like you’re immersed in it. We were just creating the Village of 1961, the Village of 1964, or a concert that you’ve always wanted to attend. And now you’re in it! I’ve had a lot of people come up to me and say, ‘Wow, I grew up in New York, and I think your New York sounds great! It just sounds like what I remember.’ It’s in the way it’s been mixed; the way we put in the crowd sounds like I’m actually at the concert. This is what we’re trying to do—we want people to feel like they’re in the scene.

Maitland: What you guys did in post is really one of the best post jobs that I’ve seen. On some music-based films, the temptation is sometimes to make it bigger and shinier. Films that use the pre-records feel very polished and clean, whereas this film, as Don said, is very real. You feel like you’re there, and that was our goal. This movie stayed real; it stayed raw.

Nominated for eight Oscars this year, A Complete Unknown is playing in theaters and available on PVOD.

For more on A Complete Unknown, check out these stories:

“A Complete Unknown”: Orchestrating 60+ Live Performances for Oscar-Worthy Sound

“A Complete Unknown” Costume Designer Arianne Phillips on Channeling the Bob Dylan Mystique

Featured image: Timothée Chalamet in A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. Photo Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2024 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

“The Substance” of Nightmares: Oscar-Nominated Makeup Effects Master Pierre Olivier Persin on His Terrifying Transformations

Since its release last fall, writer/director Coralie Fargeat’s body horror thriller The Substance has artfully shocked Academy Award voters to the tune of five Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Screenplay. Outstanding Actress nominee Demi Moore portrays aging actress Elisabeth, who gets way more than she bargained for after injecting herself with a serum that makes her look younger in the form of lithe “Sue,” played by Margaret Qualley.

Filmed in France, Fargeat enlisted prosthetics makeup designer Pierre Olivier Persin to craft the shocking transformations. The Oscar nominee and his team largely eschewed CGI, instead relying on silicone and old-school analog tricks of the trade to conjure freakish incarnations of the film’s two stars.

Speaking from his home in Paris, Persin deconstructs “The Blub,” explains Demi Moore’s “Gollum” mutation, and describes how he smashed two characters into one hideously charismatic “Monstro” hybrid.

Spoilers below!

 

Demi Moore’s character gets old very rapidly, starting with one decayed index finger and progressing to a scene where she’s aged almost beyond recognition with a shock of white hair, knobby knees, and creaky bones. What were you going for there?

For Demi’s hair, we took inspiration from the mother, played by Ellyn Burstein, at the end of Requiem For a Dream, where she’s addicted to speed. Demi’s fully covered in this scene— neck, face, contact lenses, full wig, bald patch—but we tried to keep it subtle.

The real shocker comes when Elisabeth wakes up to find she’s become a bald, naked hunchback.

We called that the “Gollum” stage. Coralie asked for details like the crooked nose and the eyebrows [slanting down] 45 degrees, so she’s a mix between a witch and a hunchback. We wanted it to be realistic but with a fantastical touch.

What was the process for bringing “Gollum” to life?

We had Demi inside the makeup, and we also had a very skinny actress with fully prosthetic arms, especially for shots where you don’t see her face. And then, we used a stunt double with complete prosthetic makeup. You might see a close-up of Demi’s face. The next shot might be the skinny actress, then the stunt double slamming into the sink in the bathroom, then switching back to Demi. So, to answer your question, we had three “Gollums” – – that’s how we did it.

Demi Moore in “The Substance.” © MUBI & Working Title!
Gollum © MUBI & Working Title!

How long would it take to get Demi Moore into Gollum mode?

That first reveal of her full upper body when Demi sees herself in the mirror probably took six hours and thirty minutes. For the full body on the skinny actress, [it took] seven and a half hours. They were fully covered because the action showed Elisabeth falling down and fighting so I didn’t want to use a suit that would wrinkle. This was full silicone prosthetic makeup from head to toe, glued to the skin.

The hump itself sort of jiggles as she moves. How’d you do that?

We had the prosthetic appliance, then hollow space, and then the actress’s body, so when she’s moved around, the hump would go like [shaking motion] Woop woop. Same with the breasts; we wanted to try as much as possible to give them this jiggly flesh quality.

 

Old Elisabeth’s skin looks pretty awful at this point.

We, of course, painted on top of the translucent prosthetics, but we also used red wool.

Wait, wool?

Like what you make a jumper from. If you work the wool a little bit, you can put red yarn inside [the silicone] and make it look like horrible varicose veins on the back of the legs. The opaque wool made a nice contrast to the translucent silicone.

Warning – graphic images ahead

When The Substance shifts focus to Margaret Qualley’s “Sue” character, she’s lying unconscious on the floor when her back splits open from within. You had storyboards, you had full-body scans of Margaret—where did you go from there?

For Sue’s back ripping open, we made two silicone dummies laying on their sides. We raised the set so we could puppeteer the silicone dummies from inside to create that rippling effect. It was a mix of cable control mechanisms and puppetry by hand. We also had a very big back prosthetic that we glued onto a stunt double.

“Sue” on the floor with her back ripped open. © MUBI & Working Title!

Back mold for “Sue,” played by Margaret Qualley in “The Substance.” © MUBI & Working Title!

SPOILER ALERT

For the crazy grand finale, Elisabeth and Sue merge their bodies together and form “Monstro Elisasue.” What was the concept there, and how did you execute it?

The concept was a little bit like putting two bodies in a shaker — you start shaking and end up with a potato head on the whole body. Coralie’s script had the idea of putting Demi’s face on the back of the body, but I came up with the rest, like the arm facing backward. And Coralie said, “Since we are putting two characters into one monster, it should have four boobs.” But Monstro has seven boobs. One guy told me, “That makes no sense.” I said, “At this point, we don’t care! She could have eight!” It’s crazy time, so Monstro can have as many boobs as she wants.

Monstro mold. © MUBI & Working Title!
Monstro mold. © MUBI & Working Title!

Monstro has a lot going on in terms of detail. Was that deliberate?

I really wanted every angle on Monstro to be interesting—the back of the head, the arm facing backward, the head twisting on the side. Also, we wanted her to be like a ballerina with a dancer’s feet, so she moves very nicely with this grotesque body. She’s not a monster that kills people or a zombie or an alien. She has this dramatic quality. Monstro was Coralie’s baby and my baby, too.

Working on monstro. © MUBI & Working Title!
Monstro mold. © MUBI & Working Title!

“Sue” is supposed to host a New Year’s Eve extravaganza, but instead, she morphs with Elisabeth into Monstro and staggers down a hallway spewing blood before she walks on stage to an audience of horrified people. How was that sequence actually performed?

All the close-ups were done on Margaret, and all the wide shots were done on the stunt doubles. When Monstro walks down the corridor with the blood going everywhere onto the walls, the stunt double had a trolley on wheels underneath her dress [for support] because the weight of the suit and the [recoil from] the blood rig was so heavy. Her real arm was sticking out against a VFX green screen, and we puppeteered as much as we could. I think we shot the scene twice, and it was done.

By the end, Elisabeth has been reduced to a puddle with a face that inches like a caterpillar down Hollywood Boulevard. Did you use CGI for that?

We called that The Blob, but we’re French, so we called it The Blub. We built a silicone puppet with rope and puppeteered the Blub on set. Demi’s crying and screaming — proper acting that you can’t get with a puppet — so we shot her [performance] live, and then the VFX people gave it an organic look. The face on Monstro’s back — Demi’s screaming face, the eyes, the tongue — all that was pure VFX.

The Blob. © MUBI & Working Title!
The Blob. © MUBI & Working Title!

You and your team of 15 people spent 11 months collaborating with The Substance creator Coralie Fargeat. What’s she like to work with?

Coralie’s really demanding about each shot, not just prosthetics. Someone drinking a glass of water is filmed as if it were the most important thing in the movie. She makes no compromises. As we say in France, Coralie left no wounded down the road. You just kill everyone!

After spending all this time within the world of The Substance, what’s your takeaway about the story’s message to the world?

The two leading ladies are so harsh with themselves. Some people don’t understand why Sue and Elisabeth fight when they meet for the first time. “They could have a tea and chat.” But no, she hates herself. So for me, in a weird way, I think that’s what this movie is saying. “Love yourself. Be kind to yourself.”

For more interviews with Oscar-nominees, check these out:

“Conclave” Oscar Nominee Peter Straughan on Scripting a Devilishly Good Vatican Thriller

How Director Mohammad Rasoulof Shot his Oscar-Nominated “The Seed of the Sacred Fig” in Secret

No More Games: “September 5’s” Oscar-Nominated Writers on the Day Terror Took Center Stage

Featured image: Margaret Qualley, foreground, plays the younger version of Demi Moor’es Elisabeth, pictured in the poster on the wall. © MUBI & Working Title!

“A Complete Unknown”: Orchestrating 60+ Live Performances for Oscar-Worthy Sound

In one of this year’s tour de force performances, Timothée Chalamet’s Oscar-nominated portrayal of one of America’s greatest singer-songwriters took almost six years to perfect (partly thanks to COVD-19 delays in production). For director James Mangold’s music biopic, A Complete Unknown, Chalamet not only learned to play the guitar and harmonica for the film, but also mastered Dylan’s famously idiosyncratic style to deliver over 40 flawless live-to-camera performances as the narrative charts his meteoric rise after arriving in New York in 1961.

As Oscar-nominated sound mixer Tod A. Maitland reveals, “Working on this film is like recording a double album and a really complex film sound at the same time.” He joins four other members of the sound team who are also nominated for their splendid work: supervising sound editor Donald Sylvester, supervising music editor Ted Caplan, and re-recording mixers Paul Massey and David Giammarco.

We recently talked to the team about the Herculean feat of pulling off such an ambitious project and why they had to hide a microphone in Chalamet’s hair for some of the sequences.

 

How big is the sound team on a project like this?

Maitland: On the production side, it’s myself, the boom operator [Jerry Yuen], sound utility [Terence C. McCormack Maitland], and the Pro Tools operator. And also the executive music producer [Nick Baxter] and music supervisor [Steven Gizicki].

Sylvester: The rest of us are in post. I had three dialog editors [Russell Farmarco, Anna MacKenzie, and Robert Troy].

Giammarco: I had two sound effects editors [Eric A. Norris and Jon Title] and a legion of Foley editors/mixers and Foley Walkers who walked the show and performed the Foley. They do footsteps, hand claps, bang into walls, and all kinds of practical sound actions for what we see on the screen.

Sylvester: It’s also called sync to picture effects.

Giammarco: This movie was quite different because we needed a full soundtrack of sound effects for international versions, and Foley played a big part in that.

Sylvester: When we translate the film and have other actors re-voice, we remove Tod’s [production] track, so we have to replace them with identical sounds. “Fully-filled” means that anything we take away, we put back.

Caplan: I had an assistant music editor [Maggie Talibart] and also worked with Steven, Nick, and his music engineer. Nick was on this movie before we ever got into production. He did pre-record with everybody and found the songs with Timmy and Monica [Barbaro, who played singer-songwriter Joan Baez]. He was on set walking them through the performances, which was crucial.

 

This film is very unique with over 60 live-to-camera music performances. So, there isn’t as much separation between production sound and mixing/editing, right?

Caplan: Yes and no. Tod miked the performances so discreetly, and it’s not one mic capturing the whole thing. You’ve got vocal mics, guitar mics, band mics, separate mics for everybody, and the crowd mics, so there’s a lot of separation even though it’s all done at once. That immensely helped us have a lot more control in post so that we weren’t saddled with one track of comp performances.

Did you have to use playback while shooting any of the singing sequences?

Maitland: I’ve done 16 music-based films and never one that didn’t have playback, ear wigs, or timing mechanisms. This film was done entirely live—if you didn’t record it [during filming], it didn’t make it onto the film. For all the performance pieces, we had 42 period-accurate microphones. We also wanted a tapestry of sounds so that each venue had a different sound to it. I watched Timmy in rehearsals and realized he held the guitar the same way Bob did, which was very high up on his body. So, for scenes where he wasn’t performing at a venue, there was really no other way to mic him other than putting the microphone in his hair and inside the guitar and using ambient mics around that. It took some convincing to get Timmy and the hair department on board, but it worked out brilliantly!

 

Did you only have to put the mic in his hair for scenes that didn’t involve a concert or a music festival?

Maitland: When he was in the hospital room, cabin, apartment, or inside the Gaslight [Café], he didn’t have a mic in front of him. Those were incredibly challenging scenes to record. If the camera is far away, you need to have a microphone close enough to capture his voice and the guitar, but there was no way to put one on his body since the guitar would cover it. So going into his hair was the only way. And it worked out brilliantly because the microphone is on his forehead aiming down right past his mouth and towards the guitar.

Wow, that’s very cool! How was the sound quality from the vintage microphones?

Maitland: They were great! Microphones back then have a very different, mid-range sound. They didn’t have the fullness that microphones have now. So, they captured the sound of that period incredibly well.

Director James Mangold and Timothée Chalamet on the set of A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. Photo by Macall Polay, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2024 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

How did you create the soundscape of 1961-1965’s Greenwich Village in New York when Bob and Sylvie (Elle Fanning) were walking in the streets? It really feels like we’ve been dropped into Lower Manhattan during that era.

Caplan: We wanted contrast in those scenes. When Bob arrives on MacDougal Street at the beginning of the movie, it feels inspiring and alive. We had nine tracks playing overlapping, coming out of cars or stores and street hucksters. One of the pieces we used was by Moondog, a real street performer from that time who played on MacDougal Street. It was really fun to find a voice for the street musically that blended with all the stuff that Dave and Don did to bring it to life.

Massey: Jim wanted it to be alive and boisterous, with different sounds and music coming at Bob from all directions and spaces as he walked across the street. Each new sound attracted his attention and was mixed to show movement as he passed by—distant perspectives becoming close and then distant again, all from different sources and directions. Conversations, acoustic guitars, preaching, club music—it was an exciting and vibrant New York soundscape.

Timothée Chalamet in A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. Photo by Macall Polay, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2024 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

What about recreating the ambient sounds of the city for two very different periods?

Caplan: When he walks in [in 1961], there’s tambourines, acoustic guitars, soul music, blues music, so many styles that gave you this excitement about him arriving to a place that was alive and full of music. Then, in 1965, when we come back to MacDougal Street, it was a lot more aggressive. What was inviting seems a little more oppressive to him. You have Peter, Paul and Mary playing, the music out of clubs, and the opera music. It’s still an eclectic sound, but now, it feels oppressive because the world has become more stressful for him.

Massey: By 1965, Bob had become more confident, and the street was teaming with creativity. So, we wanted to have different music elements highlighted as he made his way down the street. Again, acoustic panning and using distant-to-close-up perspectives on people singing, sound effects, and music as he passed by. Several of the pass-bys had to be quick and at the moment to give way for the next event. Others could overlap, lingering in the distance from a block away.

 

Check back tomorrow for the conclusion of our chat to find out what it took to accomplish the climactic sequence that recreates the famed 1965 Newport Folk Festival.

For more on A Complete Unknown, check out these stories:

“A Complete Unknown” Costume Designer Arianne Phillips on Channeling the Bob Dylan Mystique

Featured image: Timothée Chalamet in A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. Photo by Macall Polay, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2024 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

First Image From Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” Reveals Matt Damon as Odysseus

Matt Damon had a meaty role in Christopher Nolan‘s Oscar-winning Oppenheimer, playing Leslie Groves, the United States Army Corp of Engineers officer who directed the Manhattan Project, cherry-picking Robert J. Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) despite the government’s concerns about his loyalties. As great as Damon was, it was Murphy’s movie—he had the title role, after all—but now it seems it’s Damon’s turn. A new image released on X reveals that in Nolan’s latest, The Odysseus, Damon is playing the man himself, Odysseus, and he’ll be leading a mythically good cast.

Damon is joined by Tom Holland, Mia Goth, Zendaya, Anne Hathaway, Lupita Nyong’o, Robert Pattinson, Charlize Theron, Benny Safdie, Jon Bernthal, and John Leguizamo, all in undisclosed roles. It’s fun to guess who might play who (Charlize Theron as Penelope or Circe? Robert Pattinson as one of the vile suitors? Benny Safdie as Polyphemus?). We won’t know who’s who for a bit, but at least we’ve got this shot of Damon:

Homer’s 2,000-year-old epic follows Odysseus’s decade-long, torturous journey home following the Trojan War, when the hero is aiming to reunite with his wife Penelope and son Telemachus on his island of Ithaca but is stopped again and again by cruel fate, which in those times was controlled by powers a little less random. The cunning warrior is routinely thwarted by the Gods, who throw all manner of horrors his way. Odysseus eventually loses every member of his crew; the one-eyed Polyphemus eats some of them, others are killed in a battle with the Ciconians and Laestrygonians, and six are eaten by the six-headed monster Scylla. At one point, Odysseus is waylaid by the goddess Circe for a year on her island of Aeaea. As we’ve mentioned in the past, if you’re looking for a good, modern translation of the book, we suggest Emily Wilson’s “The Odyssey,” which is crystalline and vibrant—she writes it in iambic pentameter verse—yet still retains the subtle weirdness of Homer’s tale.

Nolan and his team, including his longtime cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema, are using brand-new Imax film technology for the film, which will be shot on location in places like the Sicilian island Favignana, also known as “Goat Island,” where scholars believe Odysseus came ashore with his crew to feast on barbecued goats. Nolan will once again direct from a script he wrote and is producing alongside his wife and producing partner, Emma Thomas.

The Odyssey is Damon’s third collaboration with Nolan, after Oppenheimer and Interstellar. 

No More Games: “September 5’s” Oscar-Nominated Writers on the Day Terror Took Center Stage

The thriller September 5, directed and co-written by Tim Fehlbaum, revisits the day the Palestinian militant group Black September took nine Israeli athletes hostage during the 1972 Munich Olympics. Nominated for an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay, the script, which Fehlbaum wrote with Moritz Binder, is a tightly-paced journalism procedural centered on the ABC Sports studio’s broadcast of the attack as it happened.

Peter Sarsgaard stars as Roone Arledge, the television executive overseeing the busy control room headed on the ground by Geoffrey Mason (John Magaro), who makes the key decision to have the crew cover the hostage crisis as it unfolds. In Munich to report on events like swimming and track and field, the ABC Sports team winds up becoming the sole broadcaster of the hostage situation, which, in both reality and noted in the film, was watched by approximately 900 million people.

 

September 5 conveys the events of the day with a pressing immediacy, yet we understand them almost entirely through the lens of the studio, a setting Fehlbaum likened to a submarine. He and Binder had started off broadly researching aspects like police files. It was during that process that they came to understand the importance of the media’s role that day—at one point, the ABC team realizes the terrorists are watching their broadcast, possibly foiling a rescue—and an eyewitness they spoke with suggested contacting ABC’s Geoffrey Mason.

 

“The way he told his 22 hours was so intriguing, and so thrilling, that after that two hours, Tim and I looked at each other and said, well, maybe it’s not about the media. Maybe it’s about that room,” Binder said. Making a movie almost entirely set in the ABC Sports studio appealed to Fehlbaum. I admire a movie that draws certain strength from a limitation in perspective and location and time,” he said.

After hearing gunshots and listening to a police broadcast, the ABC team gets a crew member into the restricted Olympic Village where the hostages are being held, negotiates for a better time slot with their network, and even sends German translator Marianne Gebhardt (Leonie Benesch) to the nearby military airport where the hostages have been taken by their captors. The mood in the control room is initially intense but exhilarated, as the crew gears up to cover the situation and then comes to believe, incorrectly, that the hostages have been saved.

Paramount Pictures’ “SEPTEMBER 5.” Courtesy Paramount Pictures.

“There was one moment that was crucial, actually, in that very first conversation that we had with Geoffrey Mason when we asked him how it felt for them, how he experienced those 22 hours. And he said for them, it was a complete rush. They didn’t reflect too much because there was no time for that,” Fehlbaum said. Mason told the writers that they were focused on reacting to events as they unfolded, and it was only afterward that reflection came. “And that made it clear for us that our film should feel the same,” Fehlbaum added.

Early on, the writers also knew they wanted September 5 to focus on the control room’s environment. Visually, the production is a testament to the analog age, a tactile jumble of monitors and dials and phones and paper. We wanted to portray a whole apparatus, that whole machinery of that studio that was just reporting a few hours before on a serene Olympics and is now reporting on this crisis,” the director said. To further drive home the reality of the studio, he and Binder also wrote an entire background script for the extras and any cast without lines. “They needed names, they needed a profession, and they needed to know what they’re doing so that they’re not just scrambling some paper in the background. They really have purpose in every scene,” Binder said.

 

Among September 5s main characters, almost everyone represents a real person who was there that day, with a few small details changed (it wasn’t really Geoffrey Mason’s first day on the job, for example). But Marianne, the studio’s local German translator, is semi-fictional. “We found out that that day, ABC really tried to grab every German they could grab. They even had Roone Arledge’s driver do some translations and get some information,” Binder said. The writers condensed these experiences into the character of Marianne, whom they also imbued with the forward-looking mindset of a younger German generation who had put such high hopes into the Munich Olympics. Binder’s parents are from Munich, and would have been the same age as Marianne at the time of the 1972 Olympics. “They really took me through their experience back then, their hopes and their devastation when this tragedy happened,” he said. 

Jacques Lesgardes (Zinedine Soualem), Marianne Gebhard (Leonie Benesch), Geoff Mason (John Magaro), Carter (Marcus Rutherford) star in Paramount Pictures’ “SEPTEMBER 5.” Courtesy Paramount Pictures.

September 5 isn’t the first movie about the deaths of 11 Israeli athletes that day (as well as one West German police officer and five members of Black September). Fehlbaum acknowledges being inspired by Kevin Macdonald’s One Day in September when he saw it in a Basel cinema as a teenager. Of course, he and Binder are familiar with Steven Spielberg’s Munich. What sets this film apart is its tight focus on what was also a turning point in media history. When the ABC crew finally learns their reporting that the hostages have been freed is incorrect, Marianne mourns the loss of life. Mason has the broadcast corrected. But in terms of the events within the studio itself, Arledge essentially commends a job well done.

 

 

For more films and series from Paramount and Paramount+, check out these stories:

“Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning” Launches Tom Cruise Into the Super Bowl

Rihanna Has Entered Her Blue Era in First “Smurfs” Trailer

“September 5” Production Designer Julian Wagner on Recreating the 1972 Olympic Attack From the Inside Out

 

 

Featured image: L-r, Gladys Deist (Georgina Rich), Hank Hanson (Corey Johnson, Geoff Mason (John Magaro), Jacques Lesgardes (Zinedine Soualem) star in Paramount Pictures’ “SEPTEMBER 5,” the film that unveils the decisive moment that forever changed media coverage and continues to impact live news today, set during the 1972 Munich Summer Olympics.

 

How Director Mohammad Rasoulof Shot his Oscar-Nominated “The Seed of the Sacred Fig” in Secret

Iranian filmmaker Mohammad Rasoulof wanted to tell a big story — so he went small. The Seed of the Sacred Fig explores his country’s authoritarian rule, repressive justice, patriarchal dominance, and women’s rights through its impact on one family.

Taking place during the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom movement, a nationwide protest sparked by the arrest of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Iranian woman jailed for not wearing a hijab and beaten to death while in custody, the film revolves around Tehranian lawyer Iman (Missagh Zareh), his wife Najmeh (Soheila Golestani) and their two daughters Rezvan (Mahsa Rostami) and Sana (Setareh Maleki).

A regime loyalist, Iman has recently been promoted to investigating judge in Tehran’s Islamic Revolutionary Court. Tasked with charging government dissidents, he quickly learns his role is to simply rubber stamp indictments, guilt or innocence be damned. The job also puts him in danger. So much so that he is given a gun for protection.

Missagh Zareh. Courtesy Neon.

Ignoring justice begins to weigh on Iman, and his home life takes a toll. He grows distant from Najmeh and alienates himself from his daughters, angered that their friends are being beaten and arrested. Tensions escalate. Iman’s gun goes missing, threatening to tear his family apart.  

Under government scrutiny himself, writer/director Rasoulof had to leave Iran and finish his film in Germany. To avoid prison, he now lives in exile. Hailed for its searing narrative, taut filmmaking, and uncompromising examination of Iranian rule, The Seed of the Sacred Fig has gained worldwide acclaim and has been nominated to represent Germany in the Best International Feature Film category at this year’s Oscars.

In a candid conversation deftly interpreted by scholar Sheida Dayani, Rasoulof details shooting in secret, incorporating footage shot by protestors, and why it was important to tell this story.

What did you think when you learned the film was nominated for an Oscar?

It was a very strange feeling because I am Iranian, but I’m traveling with a travel document from Germany. And the moment I heard the news, I felt like the same was happening to my film. It was made in Iran but it has surpassed all kinds of borders and languages and nationalities.

How did you come up with the idea?

After years of dealing with security agents, interrogations, going to courts, and distinguishing myself from these people, I questioned what made them different from me. How are they able to do the kinds of things they do and I am not? I was in prison when the Woman, Life, Freedom movement was at its peak. A prison official told me that he really hates his job. He doesn’t like the way his family treats him because of it. He’s thinking about suicide. That conversation sparked the idea of making a film about a family with a deep chasm.

L-r, clockwise: L-r: Mahsa Rostami, Setareh Maleki, Missagh Zareh and Soheila Golestani. Courtesy Neon.

What were the challenges in assembling your cast and crew?

This is always an issue for me when I make an underground film. How am I going to find people who think like me? This time was different. After the movement, a lot of people told me that if I needed help, they would be game… actors, technicians, and cinematographers. The movement had a huge influence on the way people found each other and wanted to work with each other. They wanted to participate in films that would defy censorship. By doing so, they reclaimed a sense of integrity.

I understand that Soheila, your lead actress, is prohibited from leaving Iran. Have you spoken with her? How is she doing?

I was actually speaking to her a few moments ago right before joining this meeting. She’s doing very well. She’s a very strong person even though she’s under a lot of pressure. She’s banned from working. She’s banned from leaving the country. Still, she is doing wonderfully.

Missagh Zareh and
Soheila Golestani. Courtesy Neon.

But Iran has taken action against the film.

We were all in a court together. She was there in person. A few of us outside Iran were tried in absentia. We were prosecuted for disseminating lies against the regime and for disseminating what they consider prostitution. This is not a translation lapse. These are the words they’re using.

It must make you think you’re doing something right.

That’s absolutely true. It does make me feel I’m doing something right. This kind of filmmaking and this kind of resistance — defying a dictatorship and a system of repression —  gives you a sense of integrity. That’s how the crew felt. Pooyan Aghababaei, my cinematographer, had many good offers, all for a lot more money. Instead, he decided to work on this.

You filmed in secret. What difficulties did that present?

It’s a very good question. Sometimes, we were on schedule. Sometimes, everything got canceled because everything got really complicated. We had three values we stuck to. One: always have a small crew. Two: have little equipment. And three: I needed to direct at a distance.

L-r: Mahsa Rostami, Missagh Zareh, and Setareh Maleki. Courtesy Neon.

Please explain this

I was connected through a monitor with a safe connection by way of safe audio. I would tell my assistants what to do on set. Sometimes I was kilometers from the set. Sometimes I was closer and I could speak through a walkie-talkie. But even when I was closer, I was never on set myself.

That sounds challenging.

Sometimes it got complicated. My voice would be broadcast and there was always an eerie feeling. The crew members joked that it felt like talking to God because it was only one way. They couldn’t talk back. It was quite difficult in the beginning. But it gradually turned into a method of its own, and we evolved from that process. It resembled when we were under lockdown for the pandemic. We learned how to connect from afar.

Why did you do it this way?

The shooting of any film, through prearrangement, is monitored by the police. On paper, this project looks fine. But if they saw me, we would get into trouble. If I were under surveillance, the project would be disclosed and we wouldn’t be able to continue. I always made sure not to take any electronics with me. If I did, they would show my location as if I were at home.

You used actual footage of the protests.  

In Iran, journalists are under a lot of pressure, especially when there are demonstrations. There is nothing they can do. In the absence of journalism, the demonstrators recorded the images themselves and broadcast them on social media and out to the world. It shows the necessity of social media for the Iranian people. I also realized there was no way I could reconstruct those scenes. Even if I could, it wouldn’t have the same impact as the real ones would have on the viewer.

L-r: Mahsa Rostami and Setareh Maleki. Courtesy Neon.

The final sequence is very tense and impactful. It reminded me of an Alfred Hitchcock film.

Initially, I envisioned a war in my mind. But when I found the location where I shot, I saw that it had great pathways and hidden spots.

 

And became a standoff.

The story of this film is greater than just a story of a family. It’s a story of a family happening in modern Iran. But it has its roots in the past. Patriarchy in Iran has very deep roots in tradition and culture. At the same time, the women’s movement is just as strong. And so I realized that the final sequence could show that the patriarchy and the women’s movement have been fighting one another throughout Iranian history. And this fight, this war, has always been under the shadow of religion. If you look at the final scene, there’s a shrine overlooking everything that’s happening.

It’s a really nice piece of filmmaking.

Thank you so much.

What do you hope audiences will take away from The Seed of the Sacred Fig?

It’s really important for me that the audience sees how devotion turns into prejudice and prejudice leads to violence.

 

Featured image: A scene from The Seed of the Sacred Fig. Courtesy Neon.

“Conclave” Oscar Nominee Peter Straughan on Scripting a Devilishly Good Vatican Thriller

Conclave is great, gripping entertainment from the first shot to the last. It’s a drama, both honest and escapist, deftly shot, performed, and staged by artists at the top of their respective games. In the hands of Academy Award-nominated screenwriter Peter Straughan, Edward Berger’s contemplative film moves briskly within the Vatican walls. A movie that takes us into one of the most secretive rituals on Earth – about the search for a new pope – is remarkably light on its holy feet.

Cardinal Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes) is the eyes, ears, and heart for the audience. After the loss of the pope, the faith-in-crisis cardinal heads the conclave. He digs through the past of the nominees for pope as he does what he can to rally a nomination for his trusted friend, a more forward-thinking man of faith, Cardinal Bellini (Stanley Tucci). Conclave is not just a drama, but a detective story about unearthing secrets and sins. 

Straughan is no stranger to crafting worlds shrouded in secrecy and fueled by ambitious, mistrustful men. He tackled espionage in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and the indie music world with the undersung Frank. With Conclave, he tells the story of men in power who find themselves powerless in the eyes of God.

 

Let’s start with Lawrence’s homily about doubt. It’s beautiful. What did your first pass at that scene look like?

That homily has stayed the same pretty much throughout the drafts, and it’s quite close to the book. I mean, that was the reason I wanted to do this. When I was reading the book, I remember reaching that point and thinking, “I definitely want to do this.” I really loved that homily. It was quietly radical to be uncertain and to be okay with that. Generally, with dialogue and monologues from books, the adaptation process is just one of hearing it and thinking about it: Is it going to feel awkward for an actor, or is it going to feel smooth? It’s obviously easier with the homily because it’s meant to be a delivered sermon rather than naturalistic dialogue. You’ve got a bit of flexibility. 

 

Is it interesting to you that, even though the homily in the movie is divisive, most Catholics are moved by that scene?

I’ve been pleased, in general, by the response to the movie. I wasn’t sure how much pushback there might be from Catholics or how much pushback there might be about the ending from other communities. Overwhelmingly, the response I’ve had personally has been very positive, which has been lovely. I find it heartwarming that people have embraced that message because it’s a hopeful message. Maybe in the world we find ourselves in now, that’s become a more and more attractive message. We’ve seen the evils of certainty.

As dialogue-heavy as the movie is, the silences – the breath, especially – say a lot. On the page, what did you want to leave unsaid? 

With adaptation, or just with screenwriting generally, it’s about what has to be said and what can be left unsaid. The more you can leave unsaid, the more interesting it is. Generally, I think the difference between a good script and a bad script is that a bad script has everything on the surface, whereas a good script works with subtext and engages the audience. Then they’re reading, they’re decoding the scene, and working out what’s going on.

 

Actors of this caliber understand that well, too, right?

With actors like John [Lithgow], Stanley, Ralph, and Isabella [Rossellini], I was there on set cutting lines a lot because you don’t need them with those actors. Sometimes, the dialogue can feel like scaffolding – it’s being put up for the scene – but the stronger the actor is, the more you can dismantle some of that scaffolding and let them do it just with their eyes or small expressions.

 

Was the act of listening a major theme for you when writing? 

In a way, Ralph’s character is struggling with doubt. He prays and doesn’t feel that he gets an answer, and he’s listening all the time for an answer. Silence felt important from the beginning, and listening felt like an important trope that we were going to use throughout the film. I was always aware of people listening through doors or walls or listening and only hearing silence. Edward picked that up and ran with it as well. After we’d shot it, he had Ralph record his breathing throughout the whole film so that Ralph would be present there. It’s a lovely soundscape that he created.

(L to R) Brían F. O’Byrne as Cardinal O’Malley and Ralph Fiennes as Cardinal Lawrence in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

As close as we are to the main character, Lawrence, he’s still such a mystery. Did you see the questions around him as the detective work for the audience? 

I’ll tell you, Lawrence was a mystery to himself. When we start with him in the film, he’s been burdened. He’s stuck with this job of having to run the conclave, which he didn’t want. He wants to leave Rome altogether. He’s struggling with his faith. He feels as if the Pope doesn’t respect him. The Pope says he’s a manager, not a shepherd. And he says he has no ambition whatsoever of being Pope. But then what he discovers, kind of like the ring in The Lord of the Rings: If you’re there long enough, it’ll seduce you in the end. 

Do you think that desire was always there from the beginning, that maybe he was fooling himself? 

I always think it’s interesting because he says to Stanley’s character at one point, “Not me. I don’t want to be Pope.” And Stanley says, “Every cardinal wants to be Pope.” And later on, Lawrence says, “If I were Pope, I’d be called John.” You realize that he has thought about it, that it has been in his head so that he didn’t really realize that ambition. He wasn’t very different from the others. The detective isn’t that different from the criminals. But then the other thing I love about it is that he’s essentially a conservative. He wanted to run the conclave with as little drama as possible. Initially, he’s horrified that there’s any scandal. He wishes it would go away and doesn’t want to do anything about it. But there’s some spark of conscience and genuineness, the courage of faith, that wakes up in him. He ends up being this conservative man disrupting the whole system.

 

It’s also a hilarious movie about the comedy of ego. How’d you approach the comedic timing and behavior? 

There’s something about them being these serious and solemn, supposedly important people. As someone said, it’s basically Mean Girls in the Vatican, and that’s great. Because the flip side of Mean Girls is that they’re just people. They’re flawed people like us. I have sympathy for them. They’re not operatic villains; they’re just ordinary, deeply flawed individuals.

With the detective work, audiences question every move and every image. For example, the ending: There’s hope there, but a lot left to question, maybe even fear. Was that always the final image? 

That’s one of the reasons why I love cinema. Even though I’m a writer – so primarily, I deal with words – I love the inflected image because it’s so powerful. You can read into it in so many ways. That shot of the three nuns is the closing shot of the film. It was just a shot that Edward sort of came up with, and then, in the edit, we found it. It wasn’t originally going to be how the film ended, but it made sense. Everything had been shut down and closed for the conclave, and now, finally, the shutters are opening. With this new Pope, is everything going to be different? And then something about these women – who have been silent throughout the film and forced to be in the background – seeing those three young nuns skipping down the stairs, chatting and laughing with each other, I thought it was a beautiful way of hinting at optimism and new hope.

 

For more on Conclave, check out these stories:

“Conclave’s” Oscar-Nominated Costume Designer Lisy Christl on the Fashion of Faith

“Conclave” Confidential: Production Designer Suzie Davies on Recreating One of the World’s Most Secretive Events

Cardinal Sins: “Conclave” Star Isabella Rossellini and Director Edward Berger on Their Thrilling New Film

Featured image: Ralph Fiennes stars as Cardinal Lawrence in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

Julian Brave NoiseCat & Emily Kassie’s on “Sugarcane”: Their Oscar-Nominated Exploration of Trauma and Truth

Toronto-born filmmaker and investigative journalist Emily Kassie has covered conflict around the globe, from the Talibans crackdown on women to child labor in Turkey. “But I had never turned the lens on my own country,” says Kassie. That’s changed with Sugarcane, which mixes a grassroots investigation with personal and collective reckoning of years of forced separation, assimilation, and abuse of Indigenous children by Catholic priests at St. Joseph’s Mission Indian residential school in British Columbia, Canada.

The film which Kassie shot and co-directed with Julian Brave NoiseCat, won the Directing Award for Documentary after its premiere at Sundance last year and is now nominated for the Academy Award for Best Documentary, making it the first time that a film with an Indigenous director from North America has been nominated. Acquired by National Geographic Documentary Films, it is streaming on Disney + and Hulu.

Kassie, in 2021, decided to focus her investigation on St. Joseph’s Mission Indian residential school in Williams Lake, British Columbia, where unmarked graves had just been discovered at the site of the former mission. She reached out to NoiseCat, a colleague when both of them began their careers as journalists. “I knew he was an incredible writer and reporter on Indigenous life. I knew he’d been good to work with,” Kassie said. What she didn’t know was that NoiseCat, who’d been raised by his mother in Oakland far from his Indigenous Canadian father, had deep roots in Williams Lake.

St. Joseph’s Mission Indian Residential School in summer. (Credit: Sugarcane Film LLC)

“Julian said, ‘That’s crazy; that’s the school my family attended, and my father was born nearby.’ That floored me,” Kassie recalled. Despite that connection, Kassie considered NoiseCat her creative partner, not a subject in the film. But as shooting progressed, and the filmmakers built trust with Williams Lake First Nation members who shared their harrowing stories, Kassie understood that “should Julian choose to participate, the film would go to another level. It took more than a year before Julian and his father would hop in a car and search for answers. It felt fated in many ways, but it was a choice only Julian could make.”

 

NoiseCat said he began to understand his personal stake in the ongoing trauma and injustice that destroyed and damaged generations on the Sugarcane Indian Reserve, including that of his father and grandmother.

“It became clear that my dad had a lot of questions about his birth, his upbringing, and the impact of the schools. Here, I was in a position to help him address, if not answer, those questions and, in so doing, help myself address my own enduring questions that begin with the schools,” said NoiseCat.

Sugarcane offers a brief but essential history of how the Canadian government in 1894 created a network of boarding schools run by the Catholic church. Tens of thousands of Indigenous children were separated from their families and forced into these institutions with the official purpose of eliminating the “Indian problem.” The abusive environment was designed to dehumanize the children, strip them of their language and all connections to their culture, and force them to follow Christianity.

Messages, some dating back a century, written by children on the walls of a barn on the site of the former St. Joseph’s Mission Indian residential school. (Credit: Christopher LaMarca/Sugarcane Film LLC)

In the film, Julian’s grandmother struggles to even talk about what happened to her as a child after she was forced, like other Indigenous children, to attend St. Joseph’s Mission residential school. Most children were sexually and emotionally abused by priests who ran the school and nuns who were complicit. Children died, some while trying to escape, their bodies buried in unmarked graves. Girls raped by priests gave birth shrouded in secrecy and shame, their newborns tossed into incinerators as witnessed by one survivor who is still haunted by the memory.  

The Catholic Church on the Sugarcane Indian Reserve. (Credit: Sugarcane Film LLC)

Julian’s father, Ed Archie NoiseCat, was born at the school but knows little else except the pain that’s engulfed and ruined his entire life. Sugarcane reveals Julian and Ed grappling with how the unspeakable has scarred their relationship. The film is also a road movie as father and son travel, literally and metaphorically, to confront the past and try to heal.

Ed Archie NoiseCat grapples with the shocking truth of his secretive birth at St. Joseph’s Mission Indian residential school. (Credit: Emily Kassie/Sugarcane Film LLC)

“I saw the bravery of survivors who were willing to trust us with painful, traumatic stories that have haunted them their entire lives. I thought, if they are willing to trust us and as the son of the only known survivor of the incinerator at the mission, I had a responsibility to other survivors and to the community,” said Julian NoiseCat. “They gave so much; I felt I had to give back. But I didn’t know it would be healing. I thought it might be harmful. But ultimately, it was a healing thing for me, for them, and for the community.”

NoiseCat expanded on the road trip and the rebuilding of his relationship with his father for his first book, We Survived the Night, out this year from Alfred A. Knopf.

Williams Lake First Nation investigator and survivor Charlene Belleau, who’s been fighting for decades to bring attention to the victims of St. Joseph’s despite institutional apathy, is a compelling figure in the film. In one of many riveting scenes, Belleau and NoiseCat discover initials and dates carved by children, as if delivering silent testimony, into the walls and beams of a boarded-up, dusty barn on the site of St. Joseph’s, which operated from 1896 to as late as 1981.

Investigator and survivor Charlene Belleau calls on Julian Brave NoiseCat to help document the search at St. Joseph’s Mission Indian residential school. (Credit: Christopher LaMarca/Sugarcane Film LLC)

Kassie was shooting that day and calls it one of the most transformative experiences she’s had as a filmmaker. “The barn was a place of horror and a place of refuge, and you could feel it in the space, the way the wind picks up, the little holes in the roof where light spills in, the sound of birds screeching through the rafters,” she said. “When Charlene starts to pray and brings Julian in, it felt like the world broke open in that moment. You can’t fully capture what it was to have witnessed it. It was life-changing and spirit-altering. It was hard to capture [in the film], but we got as close as we could to what happened in the barn that day.”

 Sugarcane’s Oscar nomination connects the film to an even wider audience and provides, at long last, some acknowledgment for what happened at Williams Lake and beyond.

“Survivors are so proud of this movement and this film. Everyone feels that they are finally being heard,” said Kassie. “The film screened in the [Biden] White House and Canadian Parliament and across indigenous communities. It’s the first time a film with an indigenous director from North America has been nominated, which is historic in Hollywood and is breaking barriers. Everyone in the community around Sugarcane feels proud of what we made with thought and care. It’s not just a story of the past.”

For NoiseCat, past and present are inseparable; for his family and in his own reckoning with what happened to them and to him. “We all have ways of coping with this history of genocide,” he said. “I hope the film helps people of my generation to get a better understanding of our parents’ and grandparents’ generation.”

 

 

 

For more conversations with Oscar-nominees, check out these stories:

“Conclave’s” Oscar-Nominated Costume Designer Lisy Christl on the Fashion of Faith

“Nickel Boys” Writer/Director RaMell Ross on Camera as Consciousness in His Oscar-Nominated Film

Oscar-Nominated Producer Maria Carlota Bruno on Recreating a Transcendent Heroine in “I’m Still Here”

 

Featured image: Julian Brave NoiseCat and his father Ed Archie NoiseCat look down at the Williams Lake Stampede from the top of “Indian Hill” on their roadtrip back to St. Joseph’s Mission, where Ed was born. (Credit: Emily Kassie/Sugarcane Film LLC)

 

Oscar-Nominated Producer Maria Carlota Bruno on Recreating a Transcendent Heroine in “I’m Still Here”

In 1964, a coup d’état overthrew Brazilian president João Goulart, initiating a military dictatorship that lasted until 1985. The former congressman Rubens Paiva went into self-exile at the time of the coup but returned to Rio de Janeiro in 1970, where he settled into a pleasant household near Leblon Beach with his wife, Eunice Paiva, and their five children. Rubens continued quietly supporting dissident Brazilian expatriates and, in January 1971, was arrested and disappeared during a military raid. Eunice’s efforts to learn what became of her husband led to her own arrest and torture over the course of 12 days, with Rubens’ death certificate withheld until 1996 (and the five people implicated in his death were never prosecuted). In the interim, Eunice not only held her family together, but she graduated from law school at age 48 and went on to become one of Brazil’s most distinguished experts on Indigenous rights.

Her son, Marcelo Rubens Paiva, chronicled what happened to his family and what his mother accomplished in his book “I’m Still Here,” which became the basis for director Walter Salles’ film of the same name. That movie is now the first-ever Brazilian-produced film to be nominated for a Best Picture Academy Award. Up for Best Actress is Fernanda Torres, who stars as Eunice (Torres’ mother, Fernanda Montenegro, plays Eunice in her eighties).

Salles’ depiction of the Paivas family life, both before and after Rubens’ arrest, is vivid and tender. It’s almost hard to believe these are actors playing a family—their tranquil affection for one another and the film’s calm, keen view into their home life at times feels more like a self-possessed documentary than a historical political drama. Audiences are brought into the beachy idyll of 1970s Leblon, which only serves to make the political prison where Eunice and, briefly, her teenage daughter Eliana (Luiza Kosovski) are held even more horrifying. Mother and children eventually move away from their house in Leblon, and the film jumps forward in time to 1996, when Eunice finally receives Rubens’ death certificate from the Brazilian state, then to 2014, when an 85-year-old Eunice, living with Alzheimer’s, sees a televised news report about her husband and seems to briefly reconnect to the past.

Executive producer Maria Carlota Bruno (Mariner of the Mountains, I Owe You a Letter About Brazil) filled us in on the challenges of recreating Leblon from a half-century ago, how Eunice’s adult children helped ensure the veracity of what we see on screen, and the echoes the themes of I’m Still Here have in the present day.

 

How was the process of recreating early 1970s Brazil? Were there particular challenges?

The first major challenge was research. The Paiva family lost a significant portion of their family photos in a fire, leaving us with very little personal archive to reference. The only existing photo of their home was an external shot taken after the family had moved out—by then, the house had already been converted into a restaurant. In 2019, we began an extensive search for archival footage in both national and international archives to gather details about Leblon in the 1970s. While Rio de Janeiro was well-documented in the 1960s, there was far less footage available from the following decade, making it even more difficult to find visual references of the Paiva family home and neighborhood.

Paiva family and friends in ‘I’m Still Here.’ Image: Alile Onawale. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

How did you proceed? 

Once we gathered enough images, the next major challenge was location scouting. It was a long and meticulous process, but we eventually found a house that bore an incredible resemblance to the real one—not only in its external features but also in the layout of its rooms. The scenes that took place in the streets were particularly challenging because the city’s geography has changed drastically over the years. The beachfront area has undergone a major architectural transformation—back in the 1970s, most of the properties facing the ocean were houses, whereas today, they have been replaced by large apartment complexes. To restore the look and feel of that era, our VFX team, led by Cláudio Peralta, worked closely with Walter to digitally reconstruct key locations, including positioning the Paiva family home as it originally stood, facing the beach.

What kind of research was necessary to accurately recreate the horrors of the prison where Eunice is held?

Daniela Thomas, associate producer and Walter Sallescreative partner in directing the film conducted extensive research, delving into books that documented firsthand accounts from individuals who were also detained at DOI-CODI [Department of Information Operations – Center for Internal Defense Operations]. These vivid testimonies were crucial in reconstructing the emotional and sonic textures of the environment. Additionally, the art department, led by production designer Carlos Conti, meticulously recreated every detail of the prison, from the cell, corridors, and interrogation room to the photo albums and documents handled by the actors on set.

Was Marcelo Rubens Paiva involved on set, or did he offer any creative direction to ensure the film stayed true to his mothers story?

Marcelo collaborated on the screenplay and was in constant contact with screenwriters Murilo Hauser and Heitor Lorega, as well as with Walter Salles throughout the scriptwriting process. His involvement extended beyond writing—he also worked closely with the screenwriters and Daniela Thomas during filming, as the script underwent numerous changes throughout production. Marcelo and his sisters were incredibly generous in sharing their familys personal archives, including photographs, and providing detailed descriptions of the furniture and objects in their home. They even helped reconstruct the layout of the house—Marcelos sister, Nalu, hand-drew the floor plan from memory. From the very beginning, he and his sisters offered unwavering support to ensure that Eunices story was portrayed with authenticity and respect. One particular scene depicting the military occupation of their home was initially rehearsed with books scattered across the floor to suggest a more violent intrusion. However, Marcelo pointed out to Walter that the military behaved in a more composed manner; in fact, one even played foosball with the the boy, and that scene was added to the film.

FERNANDA TORRES, Director WALTER SALLES on the set of ‘I’m Still Here.’ Image: Sofia Paciullo. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

Fernanda Torres is superb. Was she who the production envisioned playing Eunice Paiva early on?

Fernanda Torres has been Walter’s longtime collaborator. In 1995, they worked together on Foreign Land, Walters first feature film, co-directed with Daniela Thomas. In 2000, they reunited for a film produced for French television, a series in which various directors explored stories about the turn of the millennium. Throughout the years, they remained close friends. Fernanda had read the script early on but was engaged in other projects at the time. Initially, another actress was considered for the role, but due to personal reasons, she had to leave the project just as pre-production was about to begin. Fernanda, who had recently finished a series, was then invited to take on the role alongside her mother, Fernanda Montenegro.

Director WALTER SALLES, FERNANDA TORRES on the set of ‘I’m Still Here.’ Image: Sofia Paciullo. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

While making this film, did you see the subject matter echoed or paralleled in the present day?

Very much so. The film was shot during a time when the country was governed by the far right, which made the need to tell this story even more urgent. Though it depicts events from our past, it felt deeply connected to the present moment we were experiencing. By the time the film was completed, the government had changed, but we had come dangerously close to returning to that era—just as many other countries are facing similar threats today. While the film speaks about the past, it increasingly resonates with the reality unfolding in many parts of the world right now.

 

For more upcoming films from Sony Pictures, check out these stories:

Issa Rae on the Importance of Filming “One Of Them Days” on the Streets of Los Angeles

“28 Years Later” Trailer Releases Hell in Director Danny Boyle’s Long-Awaited Zombie Thriller Sequel

“Forrest Gump” DP Don Burgess Re-Teams with Tom Hanks, Robin Wright, and Director Bob Zemeckis on “Here”

Featured image: FERNANDA TORRES as Eunice in ‘I’m Still Here. ”Image: Alile Onawale. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

“Nickel Boys” Writer/Director RaMell Ross on Camera as Consciousness in His Oscar-Nominated Film

An introspective, promising teenager hitchhiking to college gets a ride in a car that turns out to be stolen. The driver is Black, and so is the boy. Deemed an accomplice despite his innocence, Elwood (Ethan Herisse) is remanded to Nickel Academy, a segregated Florida reform school. Nickel Boys, the Oscar-nominated film based on Colson Whitehead’s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel The Nickel Boys, follows the harrowing path Elwood is placed on by the Jim Crow South. Written by RaMell Ross and Joslyn Barnes and directed by Ross, this stunning, elegiac film shows the brutality and neglect perpetrated on the Black boys at the abusive school, as well as their youth, friendship, and efforts to survive.

Director RaMell Ross on the set of his film NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures.
Photo credit: L. Kasimu Harris © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

The Nickel Academy of the film and Whitehead’s novel are both rooted in the real history of the Dozier School, a reformatory outside Marianna, Florida, that operated from 1900 to 2011, when it was shut down due to allegations of horrific cruelty. In addition to Whitehead’s novel, Ross and Barnes turned to Erin Kimmerle’s We Carry Their Bones: The Search for Justice at the Dozier School, a forensic accounting of the school’s abuses, from farming boys out as indentured labor to death—there are 31 graves marked at the former school, but researchers found evidence of at least 55 on-site burials. The Black boys at Dozier were treated far more violently than the white ones and received little in the way of formal education.

 

Against this frightening, deadly environment, Ross’s film poignantly depicts Elwood’s close relationship with his grandmother, Hattie (Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor), and his friendship with Turner (Brandon Wilson), a more steely-eyed foil to Elwood’s earnest nature. Using point-of-view framing, Ross also invites his audience to see the boys’ lives as they do, which makes for an intimate, immediate way of viewing.

We had the chance to talk to Ross about the influence of his documentary experience while making Nickel Boys, the sensitive way he approached the violence the boys faced, and how he and his crew developed a technical language to support the film’s unique, lovely creative choices.

 

Knowing going into the writing that you wanted to shoot from a point-of-view, did that affect how you approached the script?

I’ve never written a screenplay before. The process that I did with Joslyn is now the only way I know how to do it. And it comes from, funny enough, George Miller’s Mad Max. I found out that he had just made a film of all the images, and then he went toward making a more traditional script. And Joslyn, being my co-writer and the support that she is, said to lean into my strengths. And my strengths are visualizing. Taking the point-of-view approach and the image-based approach allowed us to actually write from what a person is seeing and not from seeing the person in the scene. I think the traditional writing process may start with being in the character’s head, but then you abstract them to being an object in the frame. I think it’s quite beautiful to actually order a person’s gaze in a moment in the context of the larger narrative, to align their meaning-making process as a character with the meaning-making process as the viewer.

Brandon Wilson stars as Turner in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures. Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures© 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

When it came to shooting, how did you further develop this language?

I made this film Hale County This Morning, This Evening. In that film, I essentially did point-of-view, but its name while I was shooting was observational logic. The idea was to make the camera an organ and to use the camera as an extension of consciousness. I adapted that to Nickel Boys and used observational logic language as well as extensive consciousness language. But in the writing process, it didn’t feel like point-of-view, and it obviously didn’t feel like normal camera language. With Joslyn, I talked about sentience a bunch. Then, developing it with Jomo [Fray, the cinematographer], we looked for another frame of reference for what we were doing. And sentient perspective was what we both agreed approximated what we were trying.

Brandon Wilson stars as Turner in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures. Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

How did you achieve a sentient perspective, technically?

I had a really clear vision of what the film would look like and the way the camera would move, but I didn’t know how to do it or the technical possibilities. Jomo is a genuine wiz. He came up with adapting all of these rigs that are used on jibs that are high in the sky and these camera systems that have mimic mode. He suggested this camera called a Sony Venice that could shoot 6k, shoot IMAX quality, but be small enough to be close to the body. Dan Sasaki from Arri made custom lenses to give us these aberrations and this density that can approximate my large-format photography. He made a couple more for a couple of scenes because we needed some specific focal lengths.

Were the actors also holding cameras?

Yeah. Of course, the camera that we were using is not supposed to be on the body. So Jomo’s team had to come up with these custom rigs that could hold the weight and be balanced correctly so that we could get the movements. It’s really cool.

Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor stars as Hattie in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures.
Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

How did you decide to use the 4:3 aspect ratio for the film?

It’s interesting how one decision has multiple meanings. In the approach, I wrote that I wanted to shoot a 4:3. The first reason was because there was so much archival that was going to be in the film. You’d have to be popping out the aspect ratio or going in and zooming. And that would just be so distracting with the camera language. But then it takes on another meaning. 4:3 is television. Television was the first disseminator outside of cinema. And also, shooting point-of-view, it’s going to be a narrower frame, so that makes sense as well. But the initial reason was practical.

Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor stars as Hattie and Ethan Herisse as Elwood in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures. Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

The pacing and beats of the film are so beautiful, but I can imagine the editing process to weave archival footage into the story was painstaking. What was the process like?

Framing is quite natural and fluid, but the editing is something that had to be found. There’s no estimation of the power of two images until you put them together, and then you have to find the right image, and then it has to align with the larger narrative thrust. Nick Monsour was our editor, and what a guy he was. [With] our archival producer, Allison Brandin, and her two assistants, Alex Westfall and Gala Prudent, I think [it took] three-and-a-half, four years of researching images and us going through them, trying to find these interstitial moments to connect to the larger narrative.

How did you initially approach depicting the violence the boys face?

It’s manifold. Because Black people, in general, are over-indexed with images of violence. Cinema also has historically shown the violence—maybe more so in documentary and early photo history, and even civil rights photo history—as a necessity for proof. There was actual evidence; it was almost pedagogical.

Ethan Herisse stars as Elwood in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures. Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

And here, we don’t see that violence on-screen. But as a viewer, you’re still incredibly aware of it.

When you’re a human being in these situations, you turn away from these things. Or it’s rare that you see something this gruesome happen. It’s not something I think is quote-unquote normal. But television and cinema have made it normal. And we become voyeurs and participants in at least the aesthetic dehumanization of, or the aesthetic violence onto, people’s bodies. And so when thinking about this film, considering all those things, you have to ask why? You realize not only is it not necessary, but there are more ways to not do it than to do it. I think it allows it to explore things beyond the act, where the act doesn’t become the priority, it becomes the way in which its affects ripple backward and forward in time. And then, to be literal about it, if you make the camera an organ, as we did, and you shoot as an extension of consciousness, you’re actually just not seeing it. So, it would be unrealistic and, in fact, betray the language of the film to see it.

For more on Amazon MGM and Amazon Prime Video, check out these stories:

“Nickel Boys” Cinematographer Jomo Fray Takes a New Angle on a Difficult Past

“My Old Ass” Writer/Director Megan Park on Magic, Mushrooms, and Meeting Yourself

“Masters of the Universe” Casts Alison Brie as Villain Evil-Lyn in Amazon MGM’s He-Man Movie

Featured image: Ethan Herisse stars as Elwood and Brandon Wilson as Turner in director RaMell Ross’s NICKEL BOYS, from Orion Pictures. Photo credit: Courtesy of Orion Pictures © 2024 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

“Conclave’s” Oscar-Nominated Costume Designer Lisy Christl on the Fashion of Faith

Following his Oscar-winning WWI epic, All Quiet on the Western Front, Edward Berger’s latest, Conclave, focuses on a different kind of battle, dropping us into the Vatican in his twisty ecclesiastical thriller. After the death of the current Pontiff, the honorable and evenhanded Cardinal Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes) is charged with convening one of the most secretive rituals in the world, the conclave, where over 100 cardinals from around the world are sequestered until they decide who amongst them will be the next leader of the Catholic Church. The gathering soon derails into a brutal squirmish of succession between the liberal camp, led by Cardinal Bellini (Stanley Tucci), against hardline conservatives such as Cardinal Tedesco of Venice (Sergio Castellitto).

The film has been nominated for eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture, writing, Production Design, and a second Oscar nod for German costume designer Lisy Christl. After almost a year of developing ideas with Berger, Christl led a crew of Italian, German, Greek, and Austrian artisans working in three workshops over five months to bring Berger’s vision to life. Juxtaposing the opulence of the parade of rituals against the Cardinals’ Spartan day-to-day life in the dormitories at Casa Santa Maria, her team designed and made every item of clothing seen on the screen, all the way down to the men’s belts, crosses, rings, shoes, and hats.

We recently talked to Christl about how the rings and crosses reveal each man’s character and political leanings and how one artisan found her when they were looking for a company to produce all the clergie’s hats and headgear for the film.

 

First of all, I was thrilled to see that you worked on one of my favorite action comedies, Roland Emmerich’s White House Down! It’s one of those fun movies that I can watch over and over again.

Oh wow! This is wonderful. I loved working on it.

Can you talk about the shorthand that you have developed with Edward after working on four projects with him? What qualities of his filmmaking style make it easier for you to do your job?

Edward is an extremely reliable man—one answer, one question. He’s always there for you. He’s hard-working, extremely smart, and nice.

(L to R) Director Edward Berger and actor Ralph Fiennes on the set of CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Philippe Antonello/Focus Features ©2024 All Rights Reserved.

I’ve recently interviewed Conclave’s editor, Nick Emerson [who is also nominated for the film], and he talked about how Edward is very detailed with shot lists and storyboards, especially for the voting scenes. How did those help your process?

This is how he works. He knows his script very well. For every scene, you have a storyboard, so he knows what he needs during the shoot. He knows what he’s doing and what he wants.

 

What was your research process for this film?

I read a lot and had a ton of questions because I just had no clue about the procedure [of the conclave] when we first started. After many months of research, I talked to [liturgical consultant] Francesco Bonomo to clarify what we could do. In 1962, the Catholic Church changed many of the rules [referring to the Second Vatican Council]. So, Francesco clarified how much freedom we had within these rules to still deliver what we wanted for the film. He also advised Edward, Ralph, and all of us.

Sketch provided by Lisy Christl. Courtesy Focus Features.

What were some of the things that you learned from your research and discussions with other experts?

As you know, the Catholic Church is a very old institution. The last conclave was held in 2013 and there is a ton of material available on that. The more I studied that conclave and its history, I had questions about the changes in color and fabric throughout history. Before synthetics were available, you had wool and linen, and later on, cotton, but there was no polyester. After the Industrial Revolution, things got cheaper and more affordable. It’s also very important to understand that not every Cardinal comes from a rich diocese. So, all these factors went into their attire and the changes made over time.

Ralph Fiennes stars as Cardinal Lawrence in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

How did this knowledge inform your decision to change the fabric, colors, and style?

Cristóbal Balenciaga was a very faithful Catholic, and his designs were inspired by the Catholic Church. When I saw a Balenciaga couture show in 2022, at first, I wanted to send that to Edward but I thought it might be a bit too much. But a few days later, he sent me a video about the same show! We both had the same idea, especially trying to do something different than today’s look.

In the film, the Cardinals’ cassocks and vestments are a deeper red and made of heavier wool compared to what they wear now in real life. What went into that design decision?

We did not like the look of the current wardrobe, so we modified it to make it look simplified, cleaner, and minimalistic. There are clergies in Rome now who wear something different in the winter or use a different material, so there isn’t only one look for everyone. For the film, we wanted a very clean look for all of our Cardinals.

Sketch made by Lissy Christl. Courtesy Focus Features.
(L to R) Director Edward Berger and actor Ralph Fiennes on the set of CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Philippe Antonello/Focus Features ©2024 All Rights Reserved.

Were the costumes made from scratch or altered and rented?

We made everything from scratch. There’s nothing bought or rented. Since we changed the color [of the robes], we couldn’t buy anything.

How big was your team, including the cutters, fitters, seamstress, etc.?

We had our in-house workshop in Rome and the Cinecittà Studios, as well as two external workshops in Rome and Florence. We had 20-25 people in-house, including two cutters and three or four seamstresses. The other workshops were about the same size. The fabric is woven and dyed in factories in an Italian town called Prato. We had around 3,500 yards of fabric, so it wasn’t something we could do in-house. We made all the crosses, hats, and belts too.

John Lithgow stars as Cardinal Tremblay in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Philippe Antonello/Focus Features ©2024 All Rights Reserved.

Let’s talk about those crosses and the rings that each Cardinal wears.

These Cardinals can read each other when they see what kind of cross a man wears. This is based on research, not something we invented for the movie. Our Italian supervisor found this beautiful family-run goldsmith in Florence, Riccardo Penko, who made all the crosses and rings after I described the political orientation of each cardinal. Over generations, their clients have included the Archdiocese of Florence, Prato, or Venice, and the Vatican, so this is their life; they know each symbol used in the designs. As a designer, you don’t have years to prepare for a movie, and these goldsmiths have the knowledge of generations. So, I learned a lot from them.

Carlos Diehz stars as Cardinal Benitez in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

From afar, the Cardinals’ wardrobe may look similar. How did you differentiate the looks of each man, say Lawrence versus Bellini or Tedesco?

The deeper you go into a character, the better you know how and what he should wear. Look at Tedesco, who is a very provocative character—he wants the Church to go back to the old days when everything was in Latin and is posturing all the time. All this gives you a way more dramatic character, so he has that big cape. But Lawrence is a humble and liberal man with a lot of doubts [about his faith and the Church]. For example, in the opening scene, Tedesco comes in with his big red cape and a very rich golden cross, while Lawrence is there with a very simple black overcoat and a silver cross.

Sergio Castellitto stars as Cardinal Tedesco in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.
(L to R) Ralph Fiennes as Cardinal Lawrence and Stanley Tucci as Cardinal Bellini in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

How were the assorted hats and headgear made?

An artisan, Gino Giovannetti, in Rome basically makes all the clergy hats in Europe, and he actually found me after we had gone to ask for budgets and quotes at various shops. His is another family enterprise where the whole family is in the business. So, they made all the miters, birettas, and skull caps.

Do you have a favorite sequence or scene in the movie? Mine is Cardinal Lawrence’s homily about faith versus doubt on the first day of the conclave.

Yeah, that is a wonderful scene. And then you cut outside and see Isabella Rossellini (who plays Sister Agnes, the nun in charge of running the Casa Santa Maria) how she sits there and just listens to him. I love that scene very much. 

Conclave is available on Peacock and PVOD now.

Featured image: (L to R) Brían F. O’Byrne as Cardinal O’Malley and Ralph Fiennes as Cardinal Lawrence in director Edward Berger’s CONCLAVE, a Focus Features release. Credit: Courtesy of Focus Features. © 2024 All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Director Wes Ball & Oscar-Nominated VFX Supervisor Erik Winquist on the Groundbreaking Visuals of “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes”

Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes took the franchise to new heights of photorealism and immersive filmmaking. The groundbreaking series has pushed the envelope in motion capture and beyond, starting with 2011’s Rise of the Planet of the Apes and carrying on through three subsequent films. The latest film, Wes Ball‘s 2024 epic Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, was nominated for Best Visual Effects at the Academy Awards, and a large part of that achievement is thanks to VFX supervisor Erik Winquist, VFX producer Danielle Immerman, animation supervisor Paul Story, and the rest of the fine minds at Wētā FX.

Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes moves beyond the story of Caesar (Andy Serkis) some three hundred years after the revolutionary’s death. Now, the apes can talk and rule supreme over a dwindling and increasingly mute human population existing on the margins. Proximus Caesar (Kevin Durand) wants to destroy what’s left of humanity, while a young ape, Noa (Owen Teague), wants to fight for them. There are an astonishing 1,500 VFX shots and 33 digital minutes elegantly crafted to create a vivid naturalism.

Recently, Oscar-nominated VFX supervisor Erik Winquist and director Wes Ball spoke with The Credits about some of the hurdles they faced in telling the latest Apes epic.

 

Eric, for years, VFX artists have stated that fire, fur, and water are three of the trickiest CG challenges. Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes pushes all three elements to the max. What advancements have been made through the years that helped you and the team there?

Erik Winquist: We go through this cycle. Avatar came up with all this really great stuff. And then, an Apes film comes and takes the technology outside. So, we fast-forward 10 years, and another Avatar film had years of R&D building up to improvements on the capture process. And then we took those improvements outside into Australia for this one. Ten years ago, we were using a single camera on the actors – mocap helmets. We had a robust set of mocap cameras and things that we were able to take outside into the rainforest of Vancouver. 

(L-R): Noa (played by Owen Teague) and Raka (played by Peter Macon) in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2023 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

And now?

Erik Winquist: This time, we didn’t have to contend with the heat and the elements of summertime in Australia – the bright sunshine and everything else. And so, the big thing we had on our side was the ability to keep a little lighter footprint for certain locations. That allowed us to not have to bring all the gear off all the trucks and set up with 40 people, creating this massive footprint in a confined space. We could be more fleet-footed with the actual capture process. The captures – the hardware side of it – is one thing.

A scene still from 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2023 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.
(L-R): Noa (played by Owen Teague), Soona (played by Lydia Peckham), and Anaya (played by Travis Jeffery) in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

What about post-production?

Erik Winquist: By the time that information gets back to Wētā, we needed ways to handle 12 new characters in this film. Every one of them has a speaking role. In War for the Planet of the Apes, for the most part, the apes were speaking sign language. Here, with 12 characters, we had to make sure that each one of them had the fidelity in their face to be able to speak and the time to actually do all that animation. So, taking the data from what is now a pair of cameras on their face, which gives us depth and the ability to get a really precise look into every frame, seeing what their lips were doing and how much the jaw was protruding… 

 

What’s a major focus in pulling that off?

Erik Winquist: So, there’s this intense sense of dread and apprehension on the actor’s face. Do I read that on the ape? No? Okay, why not? Then we spent all our time making sure that the emotional read the audience gets from watching the ape character exactly mirrors what we were seeing on the human actor’s face. That was the biggest focus on this one – faithfully translating the performances that Wes was capturing with these actors on set. 

(L-R): Raka (played by Peter Macon), Noa (played by Owen Teague) , and Freya Allan as Nova in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2024 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Wes, what questions did you have in pre-production to make Erik and the effects artists’ jobs easier?

Wes Ball: Having once been a hopeful VFX artist, I knew enough to be dangerous. I’m sure that probably helped at some points. When I was there, I’d be like, “What if we did this instead? Let’s change the shot to help that a bit.” I’m sure I made those adjustments almost subconsciously because I have a camaraderie with the VFX world. At the end of the day, we’re all in it for the same reasons – to tell a cool story with cool characters. Everyone wants to do their best to achieve that goal. If I ever asked for something that was impossible, which was several times, we’d figure it out – because it was worth it. If we were going to have this scene and change this shot, it was because it was going to help the story with Noa or the audience.

Noa (played by Owen Teague). Courtesy Walt Disney Studios/20th Century Studios

What were some of those impossible tasks?

Wes Ball: Sometimes whole scenes were invented that didn’t exist. I’d take plates that I shot for other scenes and rejigger them to serve a different purpose. I’d take a different performance and put a different take into a different shot. Like Noa racing through the tunnel, for instance, we shot a version of it, but it fell away during editing. Then at some point, we were missing that classic hero’s journey moment of a character crossing the threshold into the great new world. So, we reconceived that sequence and put it back in the movie.

Noa (played by Owen Teague) in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2023 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

What did that require?

Wes Ball: It meant, “Erik, you’ve got another 30 seconds or a minute of shots to animate.” You know, we had a couple of pickup shots we wanted to do. For instance, with Proximus Caesar, there’s the dinner table scene when he tells the story about humans and their tools only making them powerful. Originally, we had a very short scene there, but we wanted a little more insight into what he was thinking. So, we came up with another minute-long sequence three weeks before we had to deliver the movie. It was wild. I had to say, “I want to say upfront, I’m sorry.” And then I would show them what I wanted to do. Usually, I’d hear someone on the other end – Erik or one of the tech leads – go, “Yeah, it’s better…”

 

How much more difficult is the handheld camerawork for animating characters, as well as these massive landscapes?

Erik Winquist: The handheld makes the clean plate process more challenging. The mantra on this movie – people were probably getting sick of hearing me say it – was, “The clean plate is the plate.” Meaning, what we want to put in the movie is the plate that doesn’t have the human actors in it, so we can put apes into that empty plate and not have to paint someone out of it first. That’s all fine and good. But the problem is, by the time we do that, we’ve already gone through four or five takes, and Wes is totally happy with what he just saw, the camera dancing with the actors.

(L-R): Soona (played by Lydia Peckham) and Noa (played by Owen Teague) in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2023 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Wes Ball: Magic happened! I captured magic! Now do it again!

Erik Winquist: Lightning in a bottle. Actors, step out. Camera operator, do that again. Focus puller, focus on the thing that’s not there anymore. It becomes challenging for the whole camera team and everybody else. Maybe we’ll work it out in post. You drop the ape into that frame, and it’s totally misframed because you couldn’t—

Wes Ball: Like, “Oh, crap! We’re actually two inches too high.” There are all these little cheats that go into making that work.

How do you combat that?

Erik Winquist: The way to combat that is motion control. The problem is that it slows the process down. It adds pain to the process for the visual effects side of things. The end result, though, is beautiful. We would have lost something if constraints had been put on the process, like “No, we can’t do handheld.” You get these shots that dance and flow from cut to cut in this beautiful way.

 

For more stories on 20th Century Studios, Searchlight Pictures, Marvel Studios and what’s streaming or coming to

Disney+, check these out:

First Images From “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Arrive Alongside Teaser

First “The Fantastic Four: New Steps” Trailer Reintroduces Marvel’s First Family to MCU

Featured image: Noa (played by Owen Teague) in 20th Century Studios’ KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2023 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.